Thanks for catching this. This is easy to take out without touching the
rest of the machinery. It also wouldn't be too hard to write a
still-faster-but-not-quite-as-much-path which correctly reverses the
sortedness of a sorted vector that includes ties. My suspicion, without
being the one who will
In the code of functions 'order' and 'sort.list' in R 3.5.0 alpha (in
https://svn.r-project.org/R/branches/R-3-5-branch/src/library/base/R/sort.R),
in "fastpass, take advantage of ALTREP metadata", there is "try the reverse
since that's easy too...". If it succeeds, ties are reordered, violating
I've run the latest version of survival through the test suites of 486 of the 565 packages
that depend on it (Depends, Imports, LinkingTo, Suggests), and have a couple small issues
that I'm taking to other authors about.
The exercise turned up a half dozen real errors in my package. I plan to su
Thanks for the report, fixed in R-devel.
Best,
Tomas
On 04/05/2018 05:01 PM, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
This is a recent R-devel. file.copy() is not vectorized if multiple
destinations succeed:
cat("foo1\n", file = "foo1")
cat("foo2\n", file = "foo2")
unlink(c("copy1", "copy2"), recursive = TRUE)
fi
