Hi Gabriel,
Thanks for asking for a better solution, as far as actually preventing
temporary files from getting deleted in the first place.
I still don't know very much about other peoples' distributions, but
Arch uses Systemd which is the culprit on my system. Systemd's
'tmpfiles.d(5)' man page
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 02:41:58PM +, Cook, Malcolm wrote:
> Might this combination serve the purpose:
> * R session keeps an open handle on the tempdir it creates,
> * whatever tempdir harvesting cron job the user has be made sensitive
> enough not to delete open files (includin
Does anyone want to manage the record for R on OpenHub?
OpenHub is a site that records metrics for open source projects. At
some point a record for R was created:
https://www.openhub.net/p/r_project
but there's no manager listed.
OpenHub says:
"""
* Only someone who works on the project and
I recently noticed a change between R-3.3.3 and R-3.4.0 in the definition
of the R_CMethodDef struct.
typedef struct {
const char *name;
DL_FUNC fun;
int numArgs;
-
R_NativePrimitiveArgType *types;
- R_NativeArgStyle *styles;
-
} R_CMethodDef;
I
(please keep me CCd, I am not subscribed)
Dear R developers,
At the Reproducible Builds project we've been trying to get build tools and
packages generate bit-for-bit identical output, even under different build
paths. This is beneficial for users because they can more easily compare their
bui
> Martin,
>
> Thanks for your work on this.
>
> One thing that seems to be missing from the conversation is that recreating
> the temp directory will prevent future failures when R wants to write a
> temp file, but the files will, of course, not be there. Any code written
> assuming the co
Martin,
Thanks for your work on this.
One thing that seems to be missing from the conversation is that recreating
the temp directory will prevent future failures when R wants to write a
temp file, but the files will, of course, not be there. Any code written
assuming the contract is that the temp
> Jeroen Ooms
> on Tue, 25 Apr 2017 15:05:51 +0200 writes:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Martin Maechler
> wrote:
>> As I've found it is not at all hard to add an option
>> which checks the existence and if the directory is no
>> longer "valid", tries to recr
Chiming in late on this thread...
> > | Are there any packages which
> > | would break if a call to 'tempdir' automatically recreated this
> > | directory? (Or would it be too much of a performance hit to have
> > | 'tempdir' check and even just issue a warning when the director
You're right, I must have mixed up my R versions when running the example,
as the problem seems to be resolved in R-devel.
Sorry for the noise and thanks again for fixing this.
Andrzej
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote:
> I attempted to fix it, and that example seems to w
I attempted to fix it, and that example seems to work for me. It's
also a (passing) regression test in R. Are you sure you're using a new
enough R-devel?
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:34 AM, Andrzej Oleś wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> thanks again for your patch! I've tested it and I'm happy to confirm th
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Martin Maechler
wrote:
> As I've found it is not at all hard to add an option which
> checks the existence and if the directory is no longer "valid",
> tries to recreate it (and if it fails doing that it calls the
> famous R_Suicide(), as it does when R starts up a
> Dirk Eddelbuettel
> on Sun, 23 Apr 2017 09:15:18 -0500 writes:
> On 21 April 2017 at 10:34, frede...@ofb.net wrote:
> | Hi Mikko,
> |
> | I was bitten by this recently and I think some of the replies are
> | missing the point. As I understand it, the problem con
Hi Michael,
thanks again for your patch! I've tested it and I'm happy to confirm that
`callNextMethod()` works with methods dispatching on `...`.
However, the second issue I reported still seems to be unresolved. Consider
the following toy example, where the `f()` calls differ in result depending
14 matches
Mail list logo
