Dear R-Devel folks,
I've just run into what initially struck me as a rather strange result, as
follows:
> sprintf('%d', c(1.0, NA))
[1] "1" "NA"
> sprintf('%d', c(NA, 1.0))
Error in sprintf("%d", c(NA, 1)) :
invalid format '%d'; use format %f, %e, %g or %a for numeric objects
So if I pass sp
Hi,
Field RdMacros was introduced in file DESCRIPTION to allow users to import
LaTeX-like macros from other packages.
Currently 'R CMD Check --as-cran' gives a NOTE:
> Unknown, possibly mis-spelled, field in DESCRIPTION:
> ‘RdMacros’
A small package demonstrating this is available at
http:
Hi, Bill et al.:
On 2017-03-09 9:58 AM, William Dunlap wrote:
It happens in the fda package because some of the headers are longer
than typical (e.g., "Repository/R-Forge/DateTimeStamp") and formatDL
dies if the indent argument is too large compared to the width argument.
It might be nice to c
It happens in the fda package because some of the headers are longer
than typical (e.g., "Repository/R-Forge/DateTimeStamp") and formatDL
dies if the indent argument is too large compared to the width argument.
It might be nice to change formatDL so it never gave such an error, but
did something r
This error can arise when getOption("width") is too small. 80 seems to be the
limit for me with R-3.3.2 on Windows.
Bill Dunlap
TIBCO Software
wdunlap tibco.com
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Spencer Graves
wrote:
> Hello:
>
>
> I tried "debug(help)" with the problem mentioned below. I