> On Sep 20, 2016, at 7:18 PM, Karl Millar via R-devel
> wrote:
>
> 'c' has an undocumented 'use.names' argument. I'm not sure if this is
> a documentation or implementation bug.
It came up on stackoverflow a couple of years ago:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24815572/why-does-function-
'c' has an undocumented 'use.names' argument. I'm not sure if this is
a documentation or implementation bug.
> c(a = 1)
a
1
> c(a = 1, use.names = F)
[1] 1
Karl
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Hi
Is the correct patch to remove the setting of the gettingEvent flag or
would it be better to flip the TRUE/FALSE setting (set to TRUE before
handling then reset to FALSE after handling) ?
Also, for this patch and for the other two you sent, one difficulty will
be with testing the patches.
I just realized that I was actually using a different random number
generator, could that be a valid reason for the discrepancy?
The code should be:
RNGkind("L'Ecuyer")
set.seed(883)
x <- rnorm(100)
x %*% x - sum(x^2) # equal to 1.421085e-14
Regards,
Alexis Sarda.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 5:2
> Alexis Sarda
> on Tue, 20 Sep 2016 17:33:49 +0200 writes:
> I just realized that I was actually using a different random number
> generator, could that be a valid reason for the discrepancy?
> The code should be:
> RNGkind("L'Ecuyer")
> set.seed(883)
> x <-
> peter dalgaard
> on Fri, 16 Sep 2016 13:33:11 +0200 writes:
> On 16 Sep 2016, at 12:41 , Alexis Sarda wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> while testing the crossprod() function under Linux, I noticed the
following:
>>
>> set.seed(883)
>> x <- rnorm(100)
>> x
