Re: [Rd] Note: no visible definition

2016-04-09 Thread Mick Jordan
On 4/9/16 12:13 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 09/04/2016 2:55 PM, Mick Jordan wrote: On 4/9/16 10:54 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 9 April 2016 at 10:28, Mick Jordan wrote: | Can someone explain a message of this form from an rscript execution: | | Note: no visible global function definition f

Re: [Rd] Note: no visible definition

2016-04-09 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 09/04/2016 2:55 PM, Mick Jordan wrote: On 4/9/16 10:54 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 9 April 2016 at 10:28, Mick Jordan wrote: | Can someone explain a message of this form from an rscript execution: | | Note: no visible global function definition for 'foo' | | | This happens right at the st

Re: [Rd] Note: no visible definition

2016-04-09 Thread Mick Jordan
On 4/9/16 10:54 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 9 April 2016 at 10:28, Mick Jordan wrote: | Can someone explain a message of this form from an rscript execution: | | Note: no visible global function definition for 'foo' | | | This happens right at the start of execution. 'foo' is only executed in

Re: [Rd] Note: no visible definition

2016-04-09 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 9 April 2016 at 10:28, Mick Jordan wrote: | Can someone explain a message of this form from an rscript execution: | | Note: no visible global function definition for 'foo' | | | This happens right at the start of execution. 'foo' is only executed in | a branch of an 'if' that is not reached

[Rd] Note: no visible definition

2016-04-09 Thread Mick Jordan
Can someone explain a message of this form from an rscript execution: Note: no visible global function definition for 'foo' This happens right at the start of execution. 'foo' is only executed in a branch of an 'if' that is not reached with the particular arguments passed to the script. If I s

Re: [Rd] (no) circular dependency

2016-04-09 Thread Adrian Dușa
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote: > In that scenario, I would expect that QCA would suggest Venn and Venn > would suggest QCA. Then there's no circular dependency problem. > Right, this is exactly what I was pointing myself in the first email: - make package A dependent on