[Rd] Small request of a feature improvement in the next version of R

2015-11-16 Thread Paul Grosu
Hi Everyone, Sorry to bother the list with this small request, but I've run into this issue and was wondering if it could be fixed in the next version of R. Sorry if it was raised in a previous thread: So when I try the following I get an error: > m <- list() > m[["A3V6HVSALQ835D"]][['profiles'

Re: [Rd] Best way to implement optional functions?

2015-11-16 Thread Thierry Onkelinx
Roxygen2 documents imported and re-exported functions. See http://www.r-bloggers.com/roxygen2-5-0-0/ Best regards, ir. Thierry Onkelinx Instituut voor natuur- en bosonderzoek / Research Institute for Nature and Forest team Biometrie & Kwaliteitszorg / team Biometrics & Quality Assurance Kliniekst

Re: [Rd] Best way to implement optional functions?

2015-11-16 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 16/11/2015 4:00 AM, Richard Cotton wrote: On 22 October 2015 at 22:55, Duncan Murdoch wrote: I'm planning on adding some new WebGL functionality to the rgl package, but it will pull in a very large number of dependencies. Since many people won't need it, I'd like to make the new parts option

Re: [Rd] Best way to implement optional functions?

2015-11-16 Thread Richard Cotton
On 22 October 2015 at 22:55, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > I'm planning on adding some new WebGL functionality to the rgl package, but > it will pull in a very large number of dependencies. Since many people won't > need it, I'd like to make the new parts optional. > Can people suggest other packages t