> Duncan Murdoch writes:
> On 02/06/2015 11:05 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>> Hi Kurt,
>>
>> On 1 June 2015 at 14:02, Kurt Hornik wrote:
>> | > peter dalgaard writes:
>> |
>> | >> On 30 May 2015, at 01:20 , Imanuel Costigan wrote:
>> | >>
>> | >> So I assume this commit means NEWS.md is
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Jeroen Ooms wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Duncan Murdoch
> wrote:
> > Several of us have been talking about this, and have more or less
> decided against pandoc for the within-R version. It is too hard to build,
> or to include with R, on weird platfo
On 02/06/2015 3:40 PM, Jeroen Ooms wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Duncan Murdoch
> wrote:
>> Several of us have been talking about this, and have more or less decided
>> against pandoc for the within-R version. It is too hard to build, or to
>> include with R, on weird platforms. Som
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> Several of us have been talking about this, and have more or less decided
> against pandoc for the within-R version. It is too hard to build, or to
> include with R, on weird platforms. Something like commonmark is more likely.
> We'd als
On 02/06/2015 11:42 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 2 June 2015 at 11:25, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| On 02/06/2015 11:05 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > Hi Kurt,
| >
| > On 1 June 2015 at 14:02, Kurt Hornik wrote:
| > | > peter dalgaard writes:
| > |
| > | >> On 30 May 2015, at 01:20 , Imanuel
This is supported by the NEWS.Rd mechanism, but many authors don't use it.
I agree; it would be wonderful if everyone used it and I think the main
(potential) advantage of this thread is to make it used (both by developers
and users) more broadly.
Kasper
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Michael D
On 2 June 2015 at 11:25, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| On 02/06/2015 11:05 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > Hi Kurt,
| >
| > On 1 June 2015 at 14:02, Kurt Hornik wrote:
| > | > peter dalgaard writes:
| > |
| > | >> On 30 May 2015, at 01:20 , Imanuel Costigan wrote:
| > | >>
| > | >> So I assume thi
I realise this is not directly related to the topic but if changes are
afoot would it be possible to make the use of any sort of news or
changelog more prominent in the documentation? I maintain one of the
CRAN task views and when someone updates his/her package it is much,
much easier for me t
On 02/06/2015 11:05 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Hi Kurt,
On 1 June 2015 at 14:02, Kurt Hornik wrote:
| > peter dalgaard writes:
|
| >> On 30 May 2015, at 01:20 , Imanuel Costigan wrote:
| >>
| >> So I assume this commit means NEWS.md is now no longer on blacklist?
| >>
|
| > in the dev
Hi Kurt,
On 1 June 2015 at 14:02, Kurt Hornik wrote:
| > peter dalgaard writes:
|
| >> On 30 May 2015, at 01:20 , Imanuel Costigan wrote:
| >>
| >> So I assume this commit means NEWS.md is now no longer on blacklist?
| >>
|
| > in the development version. Not true of released versio
10 matches
Mail list logo
