Re: [Rd] New version of Rtools for Windows

2015-01-07 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 07/01/2015 5:20 PM, Jeroen Ooms wrote: > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Duncan Murdoch > wrote: >> >> This version includes only minor updates to the tools. I indicated last >> summer that I was hoping to update GCC from the current version 4.6.3 before >> the R 3.2.0 release, but this now

[Rd] gsub with perl=TRUE results in 'this version of PCRE is not compiled with Unicode property support' in R-devel

2015-01-07 Thread Dan Tenenbaum
The following code: res <- gsub("(*UCP)\\b(i)\\b", "", "nhgrimelanomaclass", perl = TRUE) results in: Error in gsub(sprintf("(*UCP)\\b(%s)\\b", "i"), "", "nhgrimelanomaclass", : invalid regular expression '(*UCP)\b(i)\b' In addition: Warning message: In gsub(sprintf("(*UCP)\\b(%s)\\b",

Re: [Rd] New version of Rtools for Windows

2015-01-07 Thread Jeroen Ooms
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > > This version includes only minor updates to the tools. I indicated last > summer that I was hoping to update GCC from the current version 4.6.3 before > the R 3.2.0 release, but this now looks unlikely, unless someone else with > experi

Re: [Rd] Failing lm-tests due to extra 0 in scientific notation?

2015-01-07 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On 07/01/2015 06:24, Avraham Adler wrote: Hello. I've compiled R on Windows many times, and this is the first time I've seen this error. While running make check-all (and using testInstalledBasic("both")), the lm-tests routines fail, and, as far as I can tell, the diff is failing because in one

Re: [Rd] Failing lm-tests due to extra 0 in scientific notation?

2015-01-07 Thread Avraham Adler
Please let me clarify. When I said "is there a way to change that," I meant, does anyone know why R would respond that way, and does anyone have any suggestions as to what I can do or what I should investigate to get my compilation to conform. I did *not* mean, "can we change the reference." I apol

[Rd] New version of Rtools for Windows

2015-01-07 Thread Duncan Murdoch
I have just uploaded to CRAN a new version 3.2.0.1948 of Rtools for Windows. This will become visible there in a few hours, and be copied to mirrors thereafter. People who want to build packages that include compiled code can use this to supply the compilers, etc., that are necessary for the

[Rd] Failing lm-tests due to extra 0 in scientific notation?

2015-01-07 Thread Avraham Adler
Hello. I've compiled R on Windows many times, and this is the first time I've seen this error. While running make check-all (and using testInstalledBasic("both")), the lm-tests routines fail, and, as far as I can tell, the diff is failing because in one file, answers are coming back like this "3.1