This seems like the best solution (free and NULL the dev pointer in
dev_Close(), BEFORE GEdestroyDevDesc() has a go).
I think this should be safe because dev_Close() and GEdestroyDevDesc()
are only called in one place (so your free() should always happen before
GEdestroyDevDesc() and your fr
Bug submitted. Thanks.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 23/09/2014 3:20 PM, Karl Millar wrote:
>>
>> This patch is against current svn and contains three classes of fix:
>> - Ensure the result is properly terminated after calls to strncpy()
>> - Replace calls
On 23/09/2014 3:20 PM, Karl Millar wrote:
This patch is against current svn and contains three classes of fix:
- Ensure the result is properly terminated after calls to strncpy()
- Replace calls of sprintf() with snprintf()
- Added a PROTECT() call in do_while which could cause memory
This patch is against current svn and contains three classes of fix:
- Ensure the result is properly terminated after calls to strncpy()
- Replace calls of sprintf() with snprintf()
- Added a PROTECT() call in do_while which could cause memory
errors if evaluating the condition results in
> Duncan Murdoch
> on Sun, 21 Sep 2014 15:57:00 -0400 writes:
> On 21/09/2014, 1:38 PM, Rui Barradas wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> In R 3.1.1 on Windows 7 it's ok.
>>
>> > all.equal(baseenv(), baseenv()) [1] TRUE >
>> sessionInfo() R version 3.1.1 (2014-07-10) P
That patch works flawlessly.
Thanks Martyn.
Zhu
-Original Message-
From: Martyn Plummer [mailto:plumm...@iarc.fr]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 8:39 AM
To: Wang, Zhu
Cc: r-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Rd] Replace isnan and lgamma in Fortran subroutine in R package
Try this pat
Try this patch.
Martyn
On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 22:33 +, Wang, Zhu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I submitted a package which used Fortran functions isnan and lgamma. However,
> I was told that:
>
> isnan and lgamma are not Fortran 95 functions.
>
> I was asked to write 'cross-platform portable code' an
On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 07:43 +0200, Berend Hasselman wrote:
> On 23-09-2014, at 00:33, Wang, Zhu wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I submitted a package which used Fortran functions isnan and lgamma.
> > However, I was told that:
> >
> > isnan and lgamma are not Fortran 95 functions.
> >
> > I was a
