Re: [Rd] Looking for new maintainer of orphans R2HTML SemiPar cghseg hexbin lgtdl monreg muhaz operators pamr

2014-08-12 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 12.08.2014 18:24, Kuhn, Max wrote: Uwe, Thanks for the email. What is the expected data that pamr will be off the main CRAN package list? I don't want to maintain that package but I have an old, independent implementation of that classifier that I can include in caret. We have found a vo

Re: [Rd] Looking for new maintainer of orphans R2HTML SemiPar cghseg hexbin lgtdl monreg muhaz operators pamr

2014-08-12 Thread Kuhn, Max
Uwe, Thanks for the email. What is the expected data that pamr will be off the main CRAN package list? I don't want to maintain that package but I have an old, independent implementation of that classifier that I can include in caret. Thanks again, Max On 8/8/14 12:41 PM, "Uwe Ligges" wrote:

Re: [Rd] Define 'in' for new class

2014-08-12 Thread Bert Gunter
See the 'iterators' package on CRAN. -- Bert Bert Gunter Genentech Nonclinical Biostatistics (650) 467-7374 "Data is not information. Information is not knowledge. And knowledge is certainly not wisdom." Clifford Stoll On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:28 AM, peter dalgaard wrote: > > On 12 Aug 20

Re: [Rd] Compilation problems

2014-08-12 Thread peter dalgaard
On 11 Aug 2014, at 16:49 , peter dalgaard wrote: > > On 11 Aug 2014, at 15:46 , André Z. D. A. wrote: > >> No, Peter, I have the "(2014-07-10, Sock it to Me) R-3.1.1.tar.gz" source. >> Thanks for pointing it. So (I hope) it should be ok. Right? > > Not unlikely. (I goofed and thought that i

Re: [Rd] RFC: diag(x, n) not preserving integer and logical x

2014-08-12 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 11/08/2014, 10:26 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: >> Duncan Murdoch >> on Fri, 8 Aug 2014 10:51:10 -0400 writes: > > Thank you, Duncan (read inline) > > > On 07/08/2014, 4:51 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: > >> This is not at all something new(*). As maintainer of the > >> Mat

Re: [Rd] Define 'in' for new class

2014-08-12 Thread peter dalgaard
On 12 Aug 2014, at 08:29 , Simon Knapp wrote: > Hi List, > > Is it possible to define how 'in' works for an object of a specific class > (to achieve a similar result to implementing the iterator protocol in a > class Python)? > No, because 'in' doesn't really exist, it is "syntactic sugar" to