Roger,
Are you implying that your current code works differently under R-devel than
with the current release? Nothing I'm aware of would suggest that.
With or without setGeneric() (in either version but the single-argument is
cleaner), a generic function for image() is created in your package'
Hi,
I notice in R-3.1.1, if a package specifies a VignetteBuilder (such as knitr)
in its DESCRIPTION file, but
does not also depend on the specified package (in either Depends, Imports, or
Suggests), that R CMD check will say:
* checking package dependencies ... ERROR
VignetteBuilder package no
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 11/07/2014 12:11 PM, Adrian Dușa wrote:
>> [...]
>
> You have a little bit of control of the order of topics in the PDF reference
> manual (e.g. see the lattice package), but the HTML help page is produced by
> R, not by you, and is pres
Depending on what you want, you might be interested in the staticdocs
package: https://github.com/hadley/staticdocs
If you want to build your own HTML docs, and put it online somewhere,
then it could be good enough for you.
Gabor
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Adrian Dușa wrote:
> Dear list,
On 11/07/2014 12:11 PM, Adrian Dușa wrote:
Dear list,
I've noticed for some packages the Index file in the help system has a
single list of objects (arranged alphabetically), while for other
packages this list is offered separately by letters... presumably when
the number of help objects is high
I've installed R-devel
R Under development (unstable) (2014-07-09 r66111)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin13.1.0 (64-bit)
and am trying to resolve some problems that I am seeing with my
SparseM package. In prior versions I explicitly had:
setGeneric("image", function(x, ...) standardGeneric("imag
Dear list,
I've noticed for some packages the Index file in the help system has a
single list of objects (arranged alphabetically), while for other
packages this list is offered separately by letters... presumably when
the number of help objects is high.
Is there a way to manually split the help
On 11.07.2014 13:35, Spencer Graves wrote:
On 7/11/2014 1:48 AM, Adrian Dușa wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Uwe Ligges
wrote:
On 10.07.2014 23:46, Adrian Dușa wrote:
Dear All,
[...]
Well, you cannot reserve a package name. Actually you can choose any
legal name.
The story is diff
On 11/07/2014 12:35, Spencer Graves wrote:
On 7/11/2014 1:48 AM, Adrian Dușa wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Uwe Ligges
wrote:
On 10.07.2014 23:46, Adrian Dușa wrote:
Dear All,
[...]
Well, you cannot reserve a package name. Actually you can choose any
legal name.
The story is differ
On 7/11/2014 1:48 AM, Adrian Dușa wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Uwe Ligges
wrote:
On 10.07.2014 23:46, Adrian Dușa wrote:
Dear All,
[...]
Well, you cannot reserve a package name. Actually you can choose any legal name.
The story is different if you want to submit it to BioConductor
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Uwe Ligges
wrote:
> On 10.07.2014 23:46, Adrian Dușa wrote:
>> Dear All,
>> [...]
>
> Well, you cannot reserve a package name. Actually you can choose any legal
> name.
>
> The story is different if you want to submit it to BioConductor or CRAN, then
> the name m
Dear List,
does the warning "checking whether 'INDEX' is up-to-date ... NO" while
building a package appear due to missing definitions of functions that
are in the NAMESPACE but not INDEX file? Do there also exist other
causes (for this warning)?
Thank you,
Sven.
On 10/07/14 06:45, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On 09/07/2014 17:17, lejeczek wrote:
I wonder if anyone amongst developers had a chance to try
ACML.
Yes, and documented its use in the R manual over many years.
AMD's implementation when R is supposed to use it seems
to fail the test
similarly,
13 matches
Mail list logo