Hi,
Recently I saw a couple of cases in which the package vignettes were
somewhat complicated so that Stangle() (or knitr::purl() or other
tangling functions) can fail to produce the exact R code that is
executed by the weaving function Sweave() (or knitr::knit(), ...). For
example, this is a vali
On May 29, 2014, at 8:04 PM, Henric Winell wrote:
> Simon Urbanek skrev 2014-05-29 15:06:
>> Dario,
>>
>> yes, that is a bug, now fixed.
>
> Thanks for fixing it.
>
> This problem was independently reported some time ago
> (https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15016) and I beli
Simon Urbanek skrev 2014-05-29 15:06:
Dario,
yes, that is a bug, now fixed.
Thanks for fixing it.
This problem was independently reported some time ago
(https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15016) and I
believe that it can now be closed.
Henric
Cheers,
Simon
On May 29
Hi,
It may be my misunderstanding, but it seems that the "na.action" in the
princomp() function for principal components analysis does not work. Please
see this simple example:
u <- matrix(rnorm(75), ncol=1)
v <- matrix(rnorm(20), ncol=1)
x <- u%*%t(v) + matrix(rnorm(20*75),ncol=20)
x[1,1] <- N
Dario,
yes, that is a bug, now fixed.
Cheers,
Simon
On May 29, 2014, at 2:00 AM, Dario Strbenac wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a minimal example that shows a problem I'm having with parallel
> processing.
>
> library(parallel)
> mcmapply(function(x, y)
> {
> print("Running")
> Sys.sleep(10)
