On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Martin Maechler
wrote:
>> Scott Kostyshak
>> on Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:43:02 -0500 writes:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Scott Kostyshak
> wrote:
> >> Attached is a patch with suggestions for the R-lang manual at r64277.
> >>
> >
As usual: For legal advice, get a lawyer... However, yes, the GPL quite
expressedly allows licencees to distribute modified versions, provided that the
modified source code is made available and is redistributable under the GPL.
It's common courtesy and possibly also required by law (the GPL it
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Rolf Turner wrote:
>
>
> Questions:
> ==
>
>
> (2) Even if there are no such functions, is there anything intrinsically
> *wrong* with having a function possessing this somewhat schizophrenic
> nature? Is it likely to cause confusion, induce syntactical mi
There is a CRAN package licensed just as "GPL", say, XX, I want to use
in a book.
But I've needed to modify the package to make it do what I need for
expository purposes.
The package author(s) are amenable to my modifications, but probably
unlikely to
incorporate them into the CRAN version any
