This is a great comment if the primary use of the data is to make the data
available.
It is clear that a change in the internals of the class structure requires
changing the data package, and that is a clear drawback to my
recommendation. I have had to do this on several occasions.
One issue wit
Hi Daniel,
On 01/28/2014 03:49 PM, Daniel Kelley wrote:
I have an issue with a circular package dependence that prevents
building/checking, and I seek advice on breaking the circle so the packages can
pass the build-check tests that are required for CRAN submission.
The package pair I'm worki
This question is quite common in Bioconductor because of the extensive use
of S4 and because our data are often too big to stay within the size
requirements on software packages (we separate packages into software and
data, with size limits (5MB total size of final source tar ball) on
software, but
I have an issue with a circular package dependence that prevents
building/checking, and I seek advice on breaking the circle so the packages can
pass the build-check tests that are required for CRAN submission.
The package pair I'm working with is slow to build, but my tests suggest the
issue m
Hi Alex,
On 01/28/2014 03:32 AM, Axel Urbiz wrote:
Hi,
I've tried to put together a simpler example where I'm having the issue.
I've built a foo package by only including a single .R file with the two
functions listed below: trt and cmt. The second function calls the first.
In the namespace fi
On 28/01/2014 2:43 PM, William Dunlap wrote:
[inline below]
Bill Dunlap
TIBCO Software
wdunlap tibco.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:murdoch.dun...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 10:45 AM
> To: William Dunlap; Axel Urbiz; Henrik Bengtsson
> Cc: r-d
[inline below]
Bill Dunlap
TIBCO Software
wdunlap tibco.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:murdoch.dun...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 10:45 AM
> To: William Dunlap; Axel Urbiz; Henrik Bengtsson
> Cc: r-devel
> Subject: Re: [Rd] package NAMESPACE ques
On 28/01/2014 12:15 PM, William Dunlap wrote:
You can more or less get what you want by reassigning the environment
of the formula to be a child of its original environment, where you put
your private functions in the new environment. For example, do not
export trt and make the following change
You can more or less get what you want by reassigning the environment
of the formula to be a child of its original environment, where you put
your private functions in the new environment. For example, do not
export trt and make the following change to your R code:
% diff -u foo/R/cmt.R~ foo/R
Thanks for all your help on this Duncan. Much appreciated!
Regards
Axel
On Tuesday, January 28, 2014, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 14-01-28 6:32 AM, Axel Urbiz wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've tried to put together a simpler example where I'm having the issue.
>>
>> I've built a foo package by only inc
Hi,
I've tried to put together a simpler example where I'm having the issue.
I've built a foo package by only including a single .R file with the two
functions listed below: trt and cmt. The second function calls the first.
In the namespace file, if I only export(cmt), I get the following error
m
On 14-01-28 6:32 AM, Axel Urbiz wrote:
Hi,
I've tried to put together a simpler example where I'm having the issue.
I've built a foo package by only including a single .R file with the two
functions listed below: trt and cmt. The second function calls the
first. In the namespace file, if I only
12 matches
Mail list logo
