Iâm not sure whatâs going on with your setup, but this is what I get on my
machine when I press Ctrl-C just after the R prompt comes up when started with
âR -d gdb":
Program received signal SIGINT, Interrupt.
0x7fff874179aa in select$DARWIN_EXTSN ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x7fff874179aa in s
Thank you Peter and Duncan, for the explanation and discussion. As for a
workaround, I think it is more readable to define,
test <- function(a = complex(real=1, imaginary=2)){}
Best regards,
baptiste
On 19 January 2014 18:45, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 14-01-19 4:16 PM, peter dalgaard wrote
On 14-01-19 4:45 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 14-01-19 4:16 PM, peter dalgaard wrote:
It's not formals() that is doing you in. Rather, it is a conspiration between
two things:
(a) R always displays complex constants as x+yi, even if x is zero and (b)
there really is no way to specify complex c
On 14-01-19 4:16 PM, peter dalgaard wrote:
It's not formals() that is doing you in. Rather, it is a conspiration between
two things:
(a) R always displays complex constants as x+yi, even if x is zero and (b)
there really is no way to specify complex constants with non-zero real part,
i.e. 1+2
It's not formals() that is doing you in. Rather, it is a conspiration between
two things:
(a) R always displays complex constants as x+yi, even if x is zero and (b)
there really is no way to specify complex constants with non-zero real part,
i.e. 1+2i is a sum of a real and and imaginary compl
Dear list,
I'm facing an issue with the automated documentation of a function using
roxygen2. The function has a complex-valued default argument, which is
picked up by roxygen2 using formals() to generate the corresponding Usage
section of the Rd file. Unfortunately, it appears that formals() refo
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Davor Cubranic wrote:
> On Jan 17, 2014, at 6:17 AM, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
>
> > Small note: if you are using a recent version of OSX, then gdb is
> > essentially useless, but you can use llvm, which is nicer in many
> respects,
> > anyway.
>
>
> What do you mean by
On Jan 17, 2014, at 6:17 AM, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
> Small note: if you are using a recent version of OSX, then gdb is
> essentially useless, but you can use llvm, which is nicer in many respects,
> anyway.
What do you mean by this? Gdb is a debugger, and LLVM is a compiler
infrastructure. Perha
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 2:45 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On 17/01/2014 18:58, Gábor Csárdi wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I just run into this today. Apparently rexp() sometimes gives different
>> slightly results for the same seed on 32 bit and 64 bit machines. runif()
>> is the same for both, so t
