Currently on R I get the following:
> file.access(c("doesNotExist", NA))
doesNotExist
-10
where 0 means success. Is the 0 correct? I was expecting either NA or -1.
?file.access does not mention how NA values should be handled. The
subsection "3.3.4 NA handling" from the R Language Definit
On 30.09.2013 19:47, Adler, Avraham wrote:
Hello.
When trying to compile R-3.0.2 on Windows 7 64bit, I get an error relating to
"alone_decoder.c: Permission denied." The entire error code is copied below.
gcc -std=gnu99 -m64 -shared -o Riconv.dll Riconv.def win_iconv.o
touc
On 03.10.2013 21:39, Greg Snow wrote:
If the package is on CRAN then the license should be a free one that would
let you copy whatever you want from it.
That is not true for all CRAN packages.
However it would be most polite to
contact the original author first. I know that I have given p
If the package is on CRAN then the license should be a free one that would
let you copy whatever you want from it. However it would be most polite to
contact the original author first. I know that I have given permission for
a couple of my functions to be included in other packages where it would
R-developers:
I had a quick question for the group -- let's say a package I am
developing depends on a single, small function from a large
CRAN-listed package. I can, of course, set a dependency within my own
package, but are there means by which I can include the R script + man
file DIRECTLY in
Don't use .onLoad() to set class (or other nontrivial) information at load
time. Use setLoadActions(), which was created exactly to get around the
limitations of .onLoad().
For an example, see the Rcpp package, which uses this to set up load-time C++
linkages.
John Chambers
On Oct 3, 2013, a
Hi
I am writing a package in which I define a new class in the .onLoad()
hook:
,
| .onLoad <- function(libname, pkgname) {
| setClass(
| "inDrak",
| representation(
| init = "SpatialGridDataFrame"
| ),
| contains = "simObj"
| )
| }
`
Actually, Bob O'Hara had a blog post about this in August 2012:
http://occamstypewriter.org/boboh/2012/08/17/lme4_destined_to_become_stable_through_rounding/
The concluding chapter reads:
"I have been worried that lme4 will never become stable, but this latest
version mollifies me with the thou
It's an underflow problem. When comparing versions, "a.b.c" is converted
first to the integer vector c(a,b,c) and then to the double precision
value
a + b/base + c/base^2
where base is 1 greater than the largest integer component of any of the
versions: i.e 99912 in this case. The last term
This should be fixed in nlme 3.1-112.
However, nlme has little support for formulae such as resp ~ 0, and does
things like p:1 where p is the number of columns in the model matrix.
3.1-112 does better but evidently the design did not consider this
possibility.
On 30/09/2013 13:42, ONKELINX,
10 matches
Mail list logo
