[Rd] JDK not registered

2013-09-16 Thread crunch
Given: $JAVA_HOME=~/jdk1.7.0_40 $R_SHELL=/bin/sh $PATH=$R_HOME/bin:$JAVA_HOME/bin:... which jar --> ~/jdk1.7.0_40/bin/jar which javac --> ~/jdk1.7.0_40/bin/javac which javah --> ~/jdk1.7.0_40/bin/javah which java --> '', even though there is one in $JAVA_HOME/bin whereis java --> java: /bin/java /

Re: [Rd] strange behavior for RcmdrPlugin.qual

2013-09-16 Thread John Fox
Dear Erin, I noticed that your RcmdrPlugin.qual package declares qcc under Suggests, and thus qcc isn't necessarily installed along with the plug-in. The menu file for your plug-in requires the presence of qcc to install most of the menu items under the Quality Control menu. I installed your p

[Rd] strange behavior for RcmdrPlugin.qual

2013-09-16 Thread Hodgess, Erin
Hello! Over the weekend, I updated my RcmdrPlugin.qual package. It works fine on a 64 bit Windows machine but not a 32 bit. This is very strange. The new menu with all of the Quality Control stuff does not appear. Have any of you run into this sort of thing before, please? Thanks, Sincerely,

Re: [Rd] a fast table() for the 1D case

2013-09-16 Thread Hervé Pagès
Any chance some improvements can be made on table()? table() is probably one of the most used R functions when working interactively. Unfortunately it can be incredibly slow, especially on a logical vector where a simple sum() is hundred times faster (I actually got into the habit of using sum()

Re: [Rd] FOSS licence with BuildVignettes: false

2013-09-16 Thread Paul Gilbert
On 13-09-16 05:19 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote: ... Yes, and I could see really rare circumstances where vignette building takes a long time and the maintainer decides not to build vignettes as part of the daily checks. ... I thought 'BuildVignettes: FALSE' only turns of assembling the pdf, all the co

Re: [Rd] helping R-forge build

2013-09-16 Thread Matthew Dowle
On 16/09/13 16:11, Paul Gilbert wrote: (subject changed from Re: [Rd] declaring package dependencies ) ... Yes useful. But that includes a package build system (which is what breaks on R-Forge). If you could do that on a six-pack then could you fix R-Forge on a three-pack first please? The R-For

[Rd] helping R-forge build

2013-09-16 Thread Paul Gilbert
(subject changed from Re: [Rd] declaring package dependencies ) ... Yes useful. But that includes a package build system (which is what breaks on R-Forge). If you could do that on a six-pack then could you fix R-Forge on a three-pack first please? The R-Forge build system is itself an open source

Re: [Rd] Rcpp modules

2013-09-16 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 16 September 2013 at 16:12, Stefan Boehringer wrote: | my apologies for posting here instead of rcpp-devel (registration for | which did not seem to work). It is using the standard Python mailman software, as do lots of other lists. Your From: field _must_ match you registration. That is the

[Rd] Rcpp modules

2013-09-16 Thread Stefan Boehringer
Dear all, my apologies for posting here instead of rcpp-devel (registration for which did not seem to work). I try to use a Rcpp module outside a package using the following code which should work according to posts on this list/rcpp-devel. library('Rcpp'); dlr = dyn.load('build/libtestlib.so');

Re: [Rd] declaring package dependencies

2013-09-16 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 16.09.2013 13:52, Göran Broström wrote: On 09/16/2013 12:38 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 13-09-16 3:59 AM, Göran Broström wrote: On 09/15/2013 11:09 AM, Matthew Dowle wrote: I'm a little surprised by this thread. I subscribe to the RSS feeds of changes to NEWS (as Dirk mentioned) an

Re: [Rd] declaring package dependencies

2013-09-16 Thread Brian Lee Yung Rowe
I haven't used rforge, but I will look check out the scripts. The reason it would be a six-pack of work is that there are generic build systems that handle most of this work. What they don't do is act as a repository, so rforge could remain that while separating out the build process. On Sep

Re: [Rd] declaring package dependencies

2013-09-16 Thread Göran Broström
On 09/16/2013 12:38 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 13-09-16 3:59 AM, Göran Broström wrote: On 09/15/2013 11:09 AM, Matthew Dowle wrote: I'm a little surprised by this thread. I subscribe to the RSS feeds of changes to NEWS (as Dirk mentioned) and that's been pretty informative in the past :

[Rd] Patch: fix segfault from empty raster

2013-09-16 Thread QRD
Hi, A colleague recently came across an R crash, which I can boil down to the following, running under Rgui on Windows 7: library(ggplot2) ggplot(data.frame(x=1, y=1, z=4.7), aes(x, y, z=z)) + stat_summary2d() This reliably causes a segmentation fault. sessionInfo() below. What's happening is

Re: [Rd] declaring package dependencies

2013-09-16 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 13-09-15 9:58 PM, Yihui Xie wrote: I've been watching this thread closely and trying not to chime in, because as Brian Rowe mentioned about CRAN's mysterious absence in a previous reply. It's no mystery that they don't discuss CRAN policies on this list. That's been stated many times. I do

Re: [Rd] declaring package dependencies

2013-09-16 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 13-09-16 3:59 AM, Göran Broström wrote: On 09/15/2013 11:09 AM, Matthew Dowle wrote: I'm a little surprised by this thread. I subscribe to the RSS feeds of changes to NEWS (as Dirk mentioned) and that's been pretty informative in the past : http://developer.r-project.org/RSSfeeds.html Ma

Re: [Rd] declaring package dependencies

2013-09-16 Thread Göran Broström
On 09/15/2013 11:09 AM, Matthew Dowle wrote: I'm a little surprised by this thread. I subscribe to the RSS feeds of changes to NEWS (as Dirk mentioned) and that's been pretty informative in the past : http://developer.r-project.org/RSSfeeds.html Mainly though, I submit to winbuilder before s

Re: [Rd] FOSS licence with BuildVignettes: false

2013-09-16 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 16.09.2013 01:04, Ben Bolker wrote: Uwe Ligges statistik.tu-dortmund.de> writes: Setting BuildVignettes: false is fine if it is possible to build the vignettes, and the latter is checked in CRAN incoming checks (but not the daily checks). Uwe Ligges Hmmm. I was told by the CRAN

Re: [Rd] declaring package dependencies

2013-09-16 Thread Matthew Dowle
Ben Bolker wrote : Do you happen to remember what the technical difficulty was? From memory I think it was that CRAN maintainers didn't have access to Uwe's winbuilder machine. But often when I get OK from winbuilder R-devel I don't want it to go to CRAN yet. So procedures and software would ha

Re: [Rd] declaring package dependencies

2013-09-16 Thread Matthew Dowle
On Sep 16, 2013, at 01:46 PM, Brian Rowe wrote: That reminds me: I once made a suggestion on how to automate some of the CRAN deployment process, but it was shot down as not being useful to them. I do recall a quote that was along the lines of "as long as you don't need help, do whatever you wan