On 14 September 2013 at 19:01, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| On 13-09-14 9:14 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > On 14 September 2013 at 09:04, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| > | On 13-09-13 12:00 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > | > But the focus here should not be on my hobby package. The focus needs
to b
On 13-09-14 12:19 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
On 13-09-14 09:04 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 13-09-13 12:00 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 13 September 2013 at 11:42, Paul Gilbert wrote:
| On 13-09-13 11:02 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > It's not so much Rcpp itself or my 20-ish packages but
On 13-09-14 9:16 AM, Brian G. Peterson wrote:
On 09/14/2013 08:04 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>> On 13-09-13 12:00 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
But the focus here should not be on my hobby package. The focus
needs to be on how four CRAN maintainers (who do a boatload of
amazing work which is _tr
On 13-09-14 9:14 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 14 September 2013 at 09:04, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| On 13-09-13 12:00 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > But the focus here should not be on my hobby package. The focus needs to be
| > on how four CRAN maintainers (who do a boatload of amazing work
I'm a little surprised by this thread.
I subscribe to the RSS feeds of changes to NEWS (as Dirk mentioned) and
that's been pretty informative in the past :
http://developer.r-project.org/RSSfeeds.html
Mainly though, I submit to winbuilder before submitting to CRAN, as the
CRAN policies advise.
On 13-09-14 09:04 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 13-09-13 12:00 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 13 September 2013 at 11:42, Paul Gilbert wrote:
| On 13-09-13 11:02 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > It's not so much Rcpp itself or my 20-ish packages but the fact
that we (as
| > in the Rcpp author
On 09/14/2013 08:04 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>> On 13-09-13 12:00 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
But the focus here should not be on my hobby package. The focus
needs to be on how four CRAN maintainers (who do a boatload of
amazing work which is _truly_ appreciated in its thoroughness and
reach) c
On 14 September 2013 at 09:04, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| On 13-09-13 12:00 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > But the focus here should not be on my hobby package. The focus needs to be
| > on how four CRAN maintainers (who do a boatload of amazing work which is
| > _truly_ appreciated in its thorough
On 13-09-13 12:00 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 13 September 2013 at 11:42, Paul Gilbert wrote:
| On 13-09-13 11:02 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > It's not so much Rcpp itself or my 20-ish packages but the fact that we (as
| > in the Rcpp authors) now stand behind an API that also has to acc
Thanks, added to the devel-version on R-Forge.
Z
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 13 September 2013 at 08:31, Michael Friendly wrote:
| Thanks for this explanation, but I'm still confused about how to avoid
| the wrath of the CRAN-devel daemon, whose appetite for new morsels of
10 matches
Mail list logo
