> > These are obvious toy examples, but it is a real problem
> > if you want to create a class that defines names or length
> > in a meaningful way, that is incompatible with the
> > underlying data structure.
>
> Yes indeed, (and "well know").
> I'm arguing that in such a situation
Hello
My colleagues asked me to install "R" with module "shiny".
R version 3.0.1 compiled fine on Solaris 10 and is running well.
I tried to install "shiny". With the dependencies "Rcpp" should be installed
before. But the compile step did fail. See below.
The initial error message is "Err
On 20 June 2013 at 05:44, Tee-Jay-Ardie wrote:
| I guess I should start reading up on .Call.
If you look back into the R-devel archives as of a few months ago, a long
thread there came (fairly strongly and unanimously) to the exact conclusion.
With that allow me to make the case a little more s
Sorry to anyone reading this and being confused by my response: it was
meant to be a response to a different message.
Duncan Murdoch
On 13-06-19 6:53 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 13-06-19 4:44 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
Hi all,
Because str uses the generic version of length and names, it's
c
> Hadley Wickham
> on Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:44:05 -0500 writes:
> Hi all, Because str uses the generic version of length and
> names, it's currently very easy to create objects that
> break str:
> a <- structure(list(1:5), class = "a")
> length.a <- function(x) 2L
