On Jun 15, 2013, at 2:42 PM, Martin Maechler wrote:
>> Dirk Eddelbuettel
>>on Sat, 15 Jun 2013 10:45:04 -0500 writes:
>
>> On 15 June 2013 at 07:00, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>> |
>> | On 15 June 2013 at 07:47, Simon Urbanek wrote: | |
>> Because update.packages() doesn't restore th
On 15 June 2013 at 20:42, Martin Maechler wrote:
| > Dirk Eddelbuettel
| > on Sat, 15 Jun 2013 10:45:04 -0500 writes:
|
| > On 15 June 2013 at 07:00, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > |
| > | On 15 June 2013 at 07:47, Simon Urbanek wrote: | |
| > Because update.packages()
> Dirk Eddelbuettel
> on Sat, 15 Jun 2013 10:45:04 -0500 writes:
> On 15 June 2013 at 07:00, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> |
> | On 15 June 2013 at 07:47, Simon Urbanek wrote: | |
> Because update.packages() doesn't restore the
> group-writable bit. Which leads us to
On 15 June 2013 at 07:00, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 15 June 2013 at 07:47, Simon Urbanek wrote:
| | Because update.packages() doesn't restore the group-writable bit. Which
leads us to my point that this is not what you really want.
|
| Ooops. I'll take another look.
Done. "It works."
On 15 June 2013 at 07:47, Simon Urbanek wrote:
| Because update.packages() doesn't restore the group-writable bit. Which leads
us to my point that this is not what you really want.
Ooops. I'll take another look.
My initial patch to Martin did not have the argument to install, but simply a
fix
On Jun 14, 2013, at 11:27 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 14 June 2013 at 16:56, Simon Urbanek wrote:
> | On Jun 14, 2013, at 4:35 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | > But up until right now I could not update a package a colleague installed,
> | > and vice versa -- unless we sudo.
> | >
>
> Dirk Eddelbuettel
> on Fri, 14 Jun 2013 22:27:32 -0500 writes:
> On 14 June 2013 at 16:56, Simon Urbanek wrote: | On Jun
> 14, 2013, at 4:35 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > But up
> until right now I could not update a package a colleague
> installed, | > and vice v
Simon Urbanek writes:
> On Jun 14, 2013, at 4:35 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
>>
>> On 14 June 2013 at 16:17, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>> | I think it would be better to have a bit more sane handling of
>> | this. The decision is rarely at the install time of the package --
>> | e.g. did you adjus
Dear all,
To make makefiles more portable, it would be useful to have something like R
CMD texi2pdf available. It would just call the texi2pdf() function from the
tools package. We have a makefile that uses texi2pdf for the vignette in
robustbase. With this feature it would work on some more sy
Hello,
in the Random Forest package the right daughter's index is saved and used
for classification. When a tree is build, the right daughter's index is the
left daughter's index + 1. My question is, if there is a reason for saving
the index instead of calculating it.
--
View this message in con
10 matches
Mail list logo
