[Rd] Bug in stats::plot.hclust/graphics:::plotHclust/underlying C code (C_dend) in R-3.0?

2013-05-31 Thread Peter Langfelder
Hi all, it appears that plot.hclust disregards the argument 'cex'. Up until 2.15.1 (and probably all 2.15.x), specifying cex in plot.hclust changed the size of the plotted labels on each leaf. In 3.0.0 the character size remains the same irrespective of the cex setting. Since the help text for plo

Re: [Rd] R 3.0.1 : parallel collection triggers "long memory not supported yet"

2013-05-31 Thread Simon Urbanek
On May 31, 2013, at 12:14 PM, ivo welch wrote: > Dear R developers: > > ... > 7: lapply(seq_len(cores), inner.do) > 8: FUN(1:3[[3]], ...) > 9: sendMaster(try(lapply(X = S, FUN = FUN, ...), silent = TRUE)) > > Selection: .Error in sendMaster(try(lapply(X = S, FUN = > FUN, ...)

Re: [Rd] R-3.0.1 - "transient" make check failure in splines-EX.r

2013-05-31 Thread Adler, Avraham
Fascinating. Of course, I am so far out of my league now that I wouldn't have any idea of how to address the issues, let alone break down the performance into assembly calls and identify the problem. Once again, thank you for the insight! Avraham Adler -Original Message- From: Mike Mar

[Rd] R 3.0.1 : parallel collection triggers "long memory not supported yet"

2013-05-31 Thread ivo welch
Dear R developers: ... 7: lapply(seq_len(cores), inner.do) 8: FUN(1:3[[3]], ...) 9: sendMaster(try(lapply(X = S, FUN = FUN, ...), silent = TRUE)) Selection: .Error in sendMaster(try(lapply(X = S, FUN = FUN, ...), silent = TRUE)) : long vectors not supported yet: memory.c:310

Re: [Rd] R-3.0.1 - "transient" make check failure in splines-EX.r

2013-05-31 Thread Mike Marchywka
I think I just sent a reply to you but you can reply to list if you like. This new menu just has reply and you have hunt for reply all LOL.  > From: avraham.ad...@guycarp.com > To: marchy...@hotmail.com; r-devel@r-project.org > Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 10:16

Re: [Rd] R-3.0.1 - "transient" make check failure in splines-EX.r

2013-05-31 Thread Adler, Avraham
Thank you, Mike, I did not know that! I tried to prevent multi-threaded issues by setting the compiler options to be single-threaded, but I know so little about this area that there may be something else going on. Do you think that the same problem may be causing the 64-bit issue I am having (

Re: [Rd] RFC: a "safe" uniroot() function for future R

2013-05-31 Thread Ravi Varadhan
Dear Martin, I am not sure I like this idea of expanding the interval. It can have bad consequences. The best feature of uniroot is that it makes the user think about the behavior of the function. Your suggestion is in the spirit of making him unthink (if there is such a word!). Here is a ca

Re: [Rd] RFC: a "safe" uniroot() function for future R

2013-05-31 Thread Martin Maechler
> On 13-05-30 6:49 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: > >> Duncan Murdoch > >> on Thu, 30 May 2013 05:27:57 -0400 writes: > > > > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Martin Maechler > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> With main R releases only happening yearly in spring, now is > >