These are deviations from the convention: ‘is.vector(as.vector(x, m), m)’
should be true for any mode ‘m’, including the default ‘"any"’.
* Case 1
These are documented.
- ‘is.vector’ returns ‘TRUE’ if ‘x’ is a vector of the specified mode having no
attributes _other than names_. It returns ‘F
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:
>
> Is anyone on this list aware of discussions about locking down/securing R?
>
> My colleagues and I are working with health statistics in an office
> that disallows many useful tools (e.g. emacs, vim, perl, make) on the
> grounds that they
This is a useful observation. To talk about it, though, we need to re-express
it in terms that make sense for R; there are too many misconceptions otherwise.
The basic observation is this: When simple subset or element replacement is
done in a loop, normally the object is only copied on the fi
Is anyone on this list aware of discussions about locking down/securing R?
My colleagues and I are working with health statistics in an office
that disallows many useful tools (e.g. emacs, vim, perl, make) on the
grounds that they represent a security risk. We are considering pushing
back, b
Dear all
I am trying to find the best way to handle large fields in reference
classes.
As the code below shows assignment via <<- causes many copies to be made if
the subsetting is extensive (in modb1). This can cause R to run out of
memory. Creating a local copy and using the optimisation in <-
On 13-05-18 5:37 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 13-05-17 2:01 PM, Tal Galili wrote:
Hello dear R-devel,
I am not sure if this issue is tracked or not, but in case it isn't:
It appears that R 3.0.1 reproduces the error reported for R 3.0.0 here:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/R-3-0-0-wrong-MD5-chec
G'day Brian,
On Sun, 19 May 2013 08:40:04 +0100
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> Could you try current R-patched or R-devel? Works in my tests at
> least.
Tried R-patched (2013-05-18 r62762) and R-devel (2013-05-18 r62762),
installed with my original script. Things seem fine when I try to
install m
Could you try current R-patched or R-devel? Works in my tests at least.
On 19/05/2013 08:25, Berwin A Turlach wrote:
G'day Brian,
On Sat, 18 May 2013 10:28:43 +0100
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
[...]
Is it necessary for R >= 3.0.1 to have one build as
"main"-architecture and the other one as su
G'day Brian,
On Sat, 18 May 2013 10:28:43 +0100
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
[...]
> > Is it necessary for R >= 3.0.1 to have one build as
> > "main"-architecture and the other one as sub-architecture? I could
> > not find anything in the NEWS file or the Admin manual that
> > indicated that this w
