Matwey,
There are a number of ways to do this, but it depends on what exactly you
want. Do you want to execute a call to an actual R function from within C,
or do you want to directly call one of R's internal C functions (which may
work but is not future-safe unless it is part of the official API)
On May 8, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am writing C code for R, but in middle of the routine I want to call
> solve(A,b) function. What is the right way to solve linear set inside C code?
> Is it ok to just invoke La_solve()?
>
There is no such thing as La_solve().
This question was asked previously here, but not resolved:
http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e15/devel/11/08/0307.html
The upshot is that cairo is not being used as the default when it is
available, even though the documentation says:
Default "cairo" where available and reliable, otherwise "Xlib".
Hi,
I am writing C code for R, but in middle of the routine I want to call
solve(A,b) function. What is the right way to solve linear set inside C
code? Is it ok to just invoke La_solve()?
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/m
The problem is not with setting up the union, but with updating the cached
version of the subclasses that are implicitly members of the union.
Think of it this way. Class "B" does not have a superclass "C" in its
incarnation on PkgB. Only dynamically in the situation you have created does
thi
