On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Simon Urbanek
wrote:
>
> On May 3, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Gabriel Becker wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Jony Hudson
> wrote:
> > ... I guess I think of my thing as an experiment in just how much can be
> done purely in the web client. There are some adva
On 03/05/2013 2:29 PM, peter dalgaard wrote:
On May 3, 2013, at 18:42 , Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>>
>> " one practical problem with requiring GPL >=3 is that it is not GPL-2
>> compatible"
>
> It may mean that one of your users won't be able to use the package, for
example if something else that t
On May 3, 2013, at 18:42 , Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>>
>> " one practical problem with requiring GPL >=3 is that it is not GPL-2
>> compatible"
>
> It may mean that one of your users won't be able to use the package, for
> example if something else that they need requires GPL-2 licensing.
Actual
On May 3, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Gabriel Becker wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Jony Hudson
> wrote:
> ... I guess I think of my thing as an experiment in just how much can be done
> purely in the web client. There are some advantages to pure client-side (rich
> interactivity, no need fo
On 03/05/2013 11:31 AM, Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini wrote:
On 03/05/13 16:56, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>
> On May 3, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini wrote:
>
>> Dear list,
>>
>> For the maintainer of a given package, is it possible to change the licence of a
it from GPL >= 2 to GPL >=
Thank you very much for all the feedback.
I will think about carefully.
All the best,
Mauricio
--
=
Linux user #454569 -- Ubuntu user #17469
=
"If you torture any data set long enough,
it will confess anything!" (Murray L
On 02.05.2013 21:01, John Minter wrote:
I have been trying to build R-patched from source using the link
ftp://ftp.stat.math.ethz.ch/Software/R/R-patched.tar.gz
Which the file list says is linked to R-patched_2013-05-01.tar.gz but what
I download by both wget and curl (with -R -O --ssl ) is d
On 03.05.2013 16:47, peter dalgaard wrote:
On May 3, 2013, at 14:55 , Eilidh Troup wrote:
Hi,
Is is possible to create a release of a package against an older version of R?
I would like to release a new version of the package I maintain, but have some
errors when I test it against R 3.0.0
On May 3, 2013, at 11:21 AM, Jony Hudson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> thanks for the replies. Very helpful to know that it will run with just base.
> Looks like the best bet, at least to get started, is to not use the usual
> build-process, but to come up with a simple build-script for just the core.
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Jony Hudson wrote:
> ... I guess I think of my thing as an experiment in just how much can be
> done purely in the web client. There are some advantages to pure
> client-side (rich interactivity, no need for a server, ubiquity) which make
> it interesting,
>
I comp
Hi Gabriel,
yes, packages obviously contain all the good stuff, but need to start
somewhere!
The ipython notebook project is very impressive, and I've been keeping a close
eye on it, although I started out on monkeycruncher long before I was aware of
it (I make slow progress). I guess I think
Jony,
I would caution that while R will run with just base, you won't be able to
do much of anything with it. All the statistical analysis and graphing
functions reside in additional packages. So practically speaking you'll
need the workarounds Simon mentioned involving an alternative to dyn.load
On 03/05/13 16:56, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On May 3, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini wrote:
Dear list,
For the maintainer of a given package, is it possible to change the licence of a it
from GPL >= 2 to GPL >= 3 ?
In general the maintainer has no such rights. However, if the
Hi All,
thanks for the replies. Very helpful to know that it will run with just base.
Looks like the best bet, at least to get started, is to not use the usual
build-process, but to come up with a simple build-script for just the core.
Ultimately, the build script has to be different anyway, a
On May 3, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> For the maintainer of a given package, is it possible to change the licence
> of a it from GPL >= 2 to GPL >= 3 ?
>
In general the maintainer has no such rights. However, if the maintainer is
also the author and
On 03/05/2013 10:34 AM, Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini wrote:
Dear list,
For the maintainer of a given package, is it possible to change the
licence of a it from GPL >= 2 to GPL >= 3 ?
Are you the author and copyright holder of everything in the package?
If so, then I think the answer is yes.
On May 3, 2013, at 14:55 , Eilidh Troup wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is is possible to create a release of a package against an older version of
> R? I would like to release a new version of the package I maintain, but have
> some errors when I test it against R 3.0.0. Would CRAN accept a new release
> t
Hi,
Is is possible to create a release of a package against an older version of R?
I would like to release a new version of the package I maintain, but have some
errors when I test it against R 3.0.0. Would CRAN accept a new release that
works with R 2.15.3 but not R 3.0.0?
Thanks,
Eilidh Trou
Dear list,
For the maintainer of a given package, is it possible to change the
licence of a it from GPL >= 2 to GPL >= 3 ?
Thanks in advance,
Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini, Ph.D
--
=
Water Resources Unit
Institute for Environment and Sustainabili
On 03/05/2013 9:12 AM, Knut Krueger wrote:
Am 03.05.2013 13:03, schrieb Duncan Murdoch:
>
> You should install MikTeX, from www.miktex.org. I think it will put
> itself on your path, but if it does not, you need to make sure the
> miktex/bin directory is on your path.
>
Thank you, it worked
firs
Am 03.05.2013 16:05, schrieb Duncan Murdoch:
On 03/05/2013 9:35 AM, Knut Krueger wrote:
> Percent signs are comment markers in .Rd files, so if you want to keep
> one, you need to escape it by preceding it with a backslash.
>
I know but it was a copy and paste error ... I fixed it just in this
On 03/05/2013 9:35 AM, Knut Krueger wrote:
> Percent signs are comment markers in .Rd files, so if you want to keep
> one, you need to escape it by preceding it with a backslash.
>
I know but it was a copy and paste error ... I fixed it just in this way.
> Duncan Murdoch
>
by the way, what's the
Percent signs are comment markers in .Rd files, so if you want to keep
one, you need to escape it by preceding it with a backslash.
I know but it was a copy and paste error ... I fixed it just in this way.
Duncan Murdoch
by the way, what's the next step to get the files on an mirror .. if
Am 03.05.2013 09:58, schrieb R. Michael Weylandt:
Can you post the offending package?
I solved the problem all is fine now, thanks
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Martin,
Your suggestion below did the trick. The issue was obvious once this pointed
me to the correct bit of code.
Thanks much.
Terry T.
begin included text ---
trace(loadNamespace, quote(if (package == "survival") recover()))
will break into ?recover when survival is being loaded
Am 03.05.2013 13:03, schrieb Duncan Murdoch:
You should install MikTeX, from www.miktex.org. I think it will put
itself on your path, but if it does not, you need to make sure the
miktex/bin directory is on your path.
Thank you, it worked
first with a strange error message: File ended whi
On 13-05-03 3:46 AM, Knut Krueger wrote:
Where can I found hepl about latex errors:
the R CMD check tells me less, but:
* checking PDF version of manual ... WARNING
LaTeX errors when creating PDF version.
This typically indicates Rd problems.
* checking PDF version of manual without hyperrefs or
Am 03.05.2013 09:58, schrieb R. Michael Weylandt:
Can you post the offending package?
http://rrepository.konstanze-krueger.de/src/contrib/Dominance_0.9.5.tar.gz
Knut
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Can you post the offending package?
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Knut Krueger wrote:
> Where can I found hepl about latex errors:
>
> the R CMD check tells me less, but:
> * checking PDF version of manual ... WARNING
> LaTeX errors when creating PDF version.
> This typically indicates Rd probl
Where can I found hepl about latex errors:
the R CMD check tells me less, but:
* checking PDF version of manual ... WARNING
LaTeX errors when creating PDF version.
This typically indicates Rd problems.
* checking PDF version of manual without hyperrefs or index ... ERROR
Re-running with no redire
30 matches
Mail list logo
