Dear Milan and Steven,
At the risk of muddying the water further, I think that the potential confusion
here is that Poisson GLMs are applied in two formally equivalent but
substantively different situations: (1) where the counts are cells in a
contingency table, in which case the Poisson GLM is
On Feb 27, 2013, at 21:55 , Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
> Thanks for the (critical, indeed) answer!
>
> Le mercredi 27 février 2013 à 20:48 +0100, peter dalgaard a écrit :
>> On Feb 27, 2013, at 19:46 , Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
>>
>>> I cannot believes nobody cares about this -- or I'm complet
Le mercredi 27 février 2013 à 14:26 -0800, Steven McKinney a écrit :
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org]
> > On Behalf Of Milan Bouchet-Valat
> > Sent: February-27-13 12:56 PM
> > To: peter dalgaard
> > Cc: r-devel
> > Sub
> -Original Message-
> From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org]
> On Behalf Of Milan Bouchet-Valat
> Sent: February-27-13 12:56 PM
> To: peter dalgaard
> Cc: r-devel
> Subject: Re: [Rd] nobs() with glm(family="poisson")
>
> Thanks for the (critical, inde
Thanks for the (critical, indeed) answer!
Le mercredi 27 février 2013 à 20:48 +0100, peter dalgaard a écrit :
> On Feb 27, 2013, at 19:46 , Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
>
> > I cannot believes nobody cares about this -- or I'm completely wrong and
> > in that case everybody should rush to put the s
On Feb 27, 2013, at 19:46 , Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
> I cannot believes nobody cares about this -- or I'm completely wrong and
> in that case everybody should rush to put the shame on me... :-p
Well, nobs() is the number of observations. If you have 5 Poisson distributed
counts, you have 5 o
I cannot believes nobody cares about this -- or I'm completely wrong and
in that case everybody should rush to put the shame on me... :-p
In the meantime, I have come up with an alternative way of fixing this:
when modeling count data, glm() could allow users to pass a table as the
data argument,
On 27/02/2013, at 18:08 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 27 February 2013 at 17:16, Renaud wrote:
> | Hi,
> |
> | thanks for the responses.
> | Dirk I found the script you posted once. Can anyone send me a link to the
> | "beaten to death post"?
>
> Those were Simon's words, not mine, but
On 27 February 2013 at 17:16, Renaud wrote:
| Hi,
|
| thanks for the responses.
| Dirk I found the script you posted once. Can anyone send me a link to the
| "beaten to death post"?
Those were Simon's words, not mine, but I think he referred to the long-ish
and painful thread here:
http://t
Hi,
thanks for the responses.
Dirk I found the script you posted once. Can anyone send me a link to the
"beaten to death post"?
I am fine with these approaches and kind of already follow them.
I imagine that after an R-devel update you have to re-install all the
contrib packages that need to comp
On 27 February 2013 at 12:08, Renaud wrote:
| is checking out R SVN trunk the recommended way to keep up to date with
| R-devel and check packages with the latest version?
In theory.
In practice you need a time machine as I just something rejected for a test
that did not exist when I submitted :
On Feb 27, 2013, at 5:08 AM, Renaud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is checking out R SVN trunk the recommended way to keep up to date with
> R-devel and check packages with the latest version?
>
> My objective is to be able to have both R and R-devel versions
> installed/working and up to date.
> R-devel bina
On Feb 27, 2013, at 12:54 AM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
> On 02/26/2013 05:28 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 26, 2013, at 6:48 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/26/2013 03:12 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Feb 26, 2013, at 5:47 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So MA
Thanks for your insights.
What I'm actually doing is the following:
I modified R in a way that the REPL loop always parses the input into an SEXPR,
but depending on if "magic is enabled" or not, let R compute it or compute it
via my own "backend".
As I wanted to keep the changes to R itself as
Hi,
is checking out R SVN trunk the recommended way to keep up to date with
R-devel and check packages with the latest version?
My objective is to be able to have both R and R-devel versions
installed/working and up to date.
R-devel binaries would be available as symlinks in my home directory so
15 matches
Mail list logo
