after this
setClass("A")
setGeneric("bar", function(x, y) standardGeneric("bar"))
setMethod(bar, signature(x="A", y="A"), function(x, y) {})
setMethod(bar, signature(x="A", y="ANY"), function(x, y) {})
the method for signature c("A", "A") contains package information
> str(getMethod(ba
This doesn't seem to have anything to do with reference classes but
rather is deep in the evaluator. At least when set up in the simple
form of your example, the $<- method is never called.
For example:
Foo <- setRefClass("Foo")
foo <- Foo$new()
find("$<-")
[1] "package:base"
debug(base:
I've found that reference class objects tend to behave like plain old
environments wrt field access, unless a method on e.g. $<- is explicitly
defined.
Here is a code snippet:
library(methods)
Foo <- setRefClass("Foo")
foo <- Foo$new()
foo$a <- 2 # why does this succeed? not a valid field!
## se
On Aug 5, 2012, at 04:16 , Simon Urbanek wrote:
>
> On Aug 4, 2012, at 9:49 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
>
>> On 08/03/2012 11:44 PM, peter dalgaard wrote:
>>>
>>> On Aug 4, 2012, at 01:24 , Hervé Pagès wrote:
>>>
BTW, it's funny that the VERSION file in the R source tree says:
hpag
On 05/08/2012 08:53, Rainer Hurling wrote:
For some days now there had been no more daily snapshots on
ftp://ftp.stat.math.ethz.ch/Software/R/ .
The latest sources are from 07/26/2012. I think this is not indented?
Whatever '07/26/2012' means!
__
For some days now there had been no more daily snapshots on
ftp://ftp.stat.math.ethz.ch/Software/R/ .
The latest sources are from 07/26/2012. I think this is not indented?
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-d
