On 27/07/2012 23:52, Adrian Duşa wrote:
Dear R-devel,
I'm trying to validate the results from a C function, against a (trial
and tested) older R function. For reasons unknown to me, the C
function seems to give different result sometimes at each trial, even
with the very same data.
See the adv
Dear R-devel,
I'm trying to validate the results from a C function, against a (trial
and tested) older R function. For reasons unknown to me, the C
function seems to give different result sometimes at each trial, even
with the very same data.
These are the relevant outputs from R:
> library(QCA
For what it's worth, S+'s substitute() has had an evaluate=FALSE argument
to substitute() for quite a while (I think it came with Sv4). evaluate=TRUE
means to evaluate its first arument:
> myCall <- call("myFunc", as.name("arg1"))
> substitute(myCall, list(arg1=as.name("newArg1")), evaluate=TR
Hi all,
Does there already exist a version of substitute that evaluates it's
first argument? (i.e. it accepts an already quoted expression). This
seems like something that's pretty handy, but I haven't found any
existing function to do it:
substitute_e <- function(expr, env) {
eval(substitute(
> Actually, probably not the issue. You are getting it from one of R's headers
> so it may have gotten there while you configured R on your machine.
Which I didn't do, since I got a pre-built binary from CRAN. I guess
I'll try re-installing and hope the problem goes away.
Hadley
--
Assistant P
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 12-07-27 1:23 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>> New help request below
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Duncan Murdoch
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12-07-03 1:21 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
In ?Sweave, it refers to Sweave User Manual
On 12-07-27 1:23 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
New help request below
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 12-07-03 1:21 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
In ?Sweave, it refers to Sweave User Manual. In the doc folder of
utils package, I see "Sweave.pdf".
However, I can't find it from w
Feel free.
-- Bert
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:52 AM, Warnes, Gregory
wrote:
> I'll be glad to add it to the gtools package if it doesn't (immediately) go
> into one of the core packages.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jul 26, 2012, at 7:35 AM, "Bert Gunter" wrote:
>
>> Indeed!
>>
>> -- Bert
>>
I'll be glad to add it to the gtools package if it doesn't (immediately) go
into one of the core packages.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 26, 2012, at 7:35 AM, "Bert Gunter" wrote:
> Indeed!
>
> -- Bert
>
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 3:59 PM, David Winsemius
> wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 24, 2012, at 4:
