On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Simon Urbanek
wrote:
>
> On Jun 25, 2012, at 11:57 AM, andre zege wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Simon Urbanek <
> simon.urba...@r-project.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Jun 25, 2012, at 10:20 AM, andre zege wrote:
> >
> > > dput() is intended to be
On Jun 25, 2012, at 11:57 AM, andre zege wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Simon Urbanek
> wrote:
>
> On Jun 25, 2012, at 10:20 AM, andre zege wrote:
>
> > dput() is intended to be parsed by R so the above is not possible without
> > massaging the output. But why in the would
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>
> On Jun 25, 2012, at 10:20 AM, andre zege wrote:
>
> > dput() is intended to be parsed by R so the above is not possible
> without massaging the output. But why in the would would you use dput() for
> something that you want to read in Jav
On Jun 25, 2012, at 10:20 AM, andre zege wrote:
> dput() is intended to be parsed by R so the above is not possible without
> massaging the output. But why in the would would you use dput() for something
> that you want to read in Java? Why don't you use a format that Java can read
> easily -
This solution works - thanks for the feedback, everyone!
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Kohske Takahashi <
takahashi.koh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In my view the class a and b should inherit same parent, like class c.
> And S3methods should be defined for the class c.
>
> Actually, this is not a w
>
> dput() is intended to be parsed by R so the above is not possible without
> massaging the output. But why in the would would you use dput() for
> something that you want to read in Java? Why don't you use a format that
> Java can read easily - such as JSON?
>
> Cheers,
> Simon
>
>
>
>
>
Yeap, e
