I built R-trunk (rev 59537), ran 'Rtrunk CMD build data.table',
installed the resulting tar.gz into R release and it ran tests ok. So it
seems ok now, if that tested it right. Will check R-Forge again when it
catches up. Thanks.
Matthew
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 22:04 +0200, peter dalgaard wrote:
> FY
The X11 device driver does not provide the X window manager with an icon
(_NET_WM_ICON) or, under some circumstances, with a class (WM_CLASS).
This hinders usability under the new stable version of Ubuntu, which has
a (new) user interface centered around icons.
I am not sure if this was a cons
Simon Urbanek wrote
>
> Is this your real Makevars? That would override all R settings and break a
> lot of things ... You should not set anything other than PKG_xx flags in
> Makevars since the "regular" flags are taken from R. Providing the source
> of package.tar.gz would give us more insight
On Jun 7, 2012, at 1:32 PM, alexholehouse wrote:
> Hello all - first time poster long time reader,
>
> I'm currently working on a package, and was interested to compare
> performance with and without gcc/g++ -O based optimization. I can turn the
> -O flags off with a ~.R/Makevars file, but when
Hello all - first time poster long time reader,
I'm currently working on a package, and was interested to compare
performance with and without gcc/g++ -O based optimization. I can turn the
-O flags off with a ~.R/Makevars file, but when I do something odd happens.
The package installs fine when gc
> On 07/06/2012 12:49, Matthew Dowle wrote:
>>> On 07/06/2012 11:40, Matthew Dowle wrote:
Prof Ripley wrote :
> That Depends line is about source installs.
I can't see that documented in either Writing R Extensions or
?install.packages. Is it somewhere else? I thought D
On Jun 7, 2012, at 7:49 AM, Matthew Dowle wrote:
>> On 07/06/2012 11:40, Matthew Dowle wrote:
>>>
>>> Prof Ripley wrote :
That Depends line is about source installs.
>>>
>>> I can't see that documented in either Writing R Extensions or
>>> ?install.packages. Is it somewhere else? I thought
On 07/06/2012 12:49, Matthew Dowle wrote:
On 07/06/2012 11:40, Matthew Dowle wrote:
Prof Ripley wrote :
That Depends line is about source installs.
I can't see that documented in either Writing R Extensions or
?install.packages. Is it somewhere else? I thought Depends applied to
binaries fro
> On 07/06/2012 11:40, Matthew Dowle wrote:
>>
>> Prof Ripley wrote :
>>> That Depends line is about source installs.
>>
>> I can't see that documented in either Writing R Extensions or
>> ?install.packages. Is it somewhere else? I thought Depends applied to
>> binaries from CRAN too, which is the
On 07/06/2012 11:40, Matthew Dowle wrote:
Prof Ripley wrote :
That Depends line is about source installs.
I can't see that documented in either Writing R Extensions or
?install.packages. Is it somewhere else? I thought Depends applied to
binaries from CRAN too, which is the default method on
Prof Ripley wrote :
> That Depends line is about source installs.
I can't see that documented in either Writing R Extensions or
?install.packages. Is it somewhere else? I thought Depends applied to
binaries from CRAN too, which is the default method on Windows and Mac.
Matthew
_
On 07/06/2012 11:12, Matthew Dowle wrote:
Prof Ripley wrote :
(AFAIK the CRAN binary package providers expect users to be
using the current version of R.)
I guess it's quite common practice for very many users to fail that
expectation. I for one do. I'm used to seeing "Warning: package was
b
Prof Ripley wrote :
> (AFAIK the CRAN binary package providers expect users to be
> using the current version of R.)
I guess it's quite common practice for very many users to fail that
expectation. I for one do. I'm used to seeing "Warning: package was
build using " when installing from CRAN. Bu
Henrik Bengtsson biostat.ucsf.edu> writes:
> See also R-devel '[Rd] Suggestion for memory optimization and
> as.double() with friends', March 28-29 2007
> [https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2007-March/045109.html].
>
> /Henrik
Interesting thread. So we have you to thank for instigating tha
On 06/06/2012 21:04, peter dalgaard wrote:
FYI, Brian has backed out the changes to identical() in r59533 of R-patched.
Please retry your test codes with the new version. (Due to some ISP mess-up,
Brian is temporarily unable to reply in detail himself.)
-pd
Some comments (now my ISP has repa
15 matches
Mail list logo