We've seen similar things several times with CRAN submissions. Basic
scenario was
- INSTALL (via build or check) is trying to install a package that is
not already installed, into a private library not on the usual .libPaths().
- Start-up code in that package is looking for the package, and
On 3/29/2012 8:39 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
On 12-03-29 09:29 PM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote:
> I'm concerned this thread is heading the wrong way, towards
> techno-fixes for imaginary problems. R package-building is already
> encumbered with a huge set of complicated rules, and more
> instruc
On 12-03-29 09:29 PM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote:
> I'm concerned this thread is heading the wrong way, towards
> techno-fixes for imaginary problems. R package-building is already
> encumbered with a huge set of complicated rules, and more
> instructions/rules eg for metadata would make thin
I'm concerned this thread is heading the wrong way, towards techno-fixes for
imaginary problems. R package-building is already encumbered with a huge set of
complicated rules, and more instructions/rules eg for metadata would make
things worse not better.
RCMD CHECK on the 'mvbutils' package ge
On 29.03.2012 22:54, Ben Bolker wrote:
I am attempting to build a package on r-forge and running into a
weird error. I have been in correspondence with the R-forge admins
and am turning to r-devel on the remote chance that someone might have
a guess as to what is going wrong or a suggestio
I am attempting to build a package on r-forge and running into a
weird error. I have been in correspondence with the R-forge admins
and am turning to r-devel on the remote chance that someone might have
a guess as to what is going wrong or a suggestion about further
diagnostics/experiments I co
> Most of that stuff is already in codetools, at least when it is checking
> functions
> with checkUsage(). E.g., arguments of ~ are not checked. The expr argument
> to with() will not be checked if you add skipWith=FALSE to the call to
> checkUsage.
>
> > library(codetools)
>
> > checkUsag
> > codetools should be able to do special checks for known functions that
> > do not following the standard evaluation rules . E.g., do not check any
> > arguments of `~`, do not check the 'expr' argument of with, do not check
> > the subset or weights arguments of lm.
> >
> > If a package write
On 3/29/2012 11:29 AM, William Dunlap wrote:
Bill Dunlap
Spotfire, TIBCO Software
wdunlap tibco.com
-Original Message-
From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On
Behalf
Of Matthew Dowle
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 10:41 AM
To: r-de...@stat.math.e
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Dai, Hongying, wrote:
> Dear R users,
>
> I'm wondering how I can generate an arbitrary number of loops in R.
> For instance, I can generate two "for" loops to get ICC among any two-way
> combination among 10 variables. Here is the code
>
> n<-10
> for (i in 1:(n-
Bill Dunlap
Spotfire, TIBCO Software
wdunlap tibco.com
> -Original Message-
> From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On
> Behalf
> Of Matthew Dowle
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 10:41 AM
> To: r-de...@stat.math.ethz.ch
> Subject: Re: [Rd] CRAN pol
William Dunlap tibco.com> writes:
> > -Original Message-
> > The survival package has a similar special case: the routines for
> > expected population survival are set up to accept multiple types of date
> > format so have lines like
> > if (class(x) == 'chron') { y <- as.numeric(x -
I'l like to chime in on the subject of vignette checks.
I have one vignette in the coxme library that would be better described
as a white paper. It discusses the adequacy of the Laplace transform
under various scenarios. It contains some substantial computations, so
I'd like to mark it as "ne
> -Original Message-
> From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On
> Behalf
> Of Terry Therneau
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 7:02 AM
> To: r-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Rd] CRAN policies
>
> On 03/29/2012 05:00 AM, r-devel-requ...@r-project.or
On 3/29/2012 7:07 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 29 March 2012 at 07:58, Brian G. Peterson wrote:
| On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 16:52 +1300, Thomas Lumley wrote:
|> The 'No visible binding for global variable" is a good example. This
|> found some bugs in my 'survey' package, which I removed. There
On 29 March 2012 at 07:58, Brian G. Peterson wrote:
| On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 16:52 +1300, Thomas Lumley wrote:
| > The 'No visible binding for global variable" is a good example. This
| > found some bugs in my 'survey' package, which I removed. There is
| > still one note of this type, which arise
On 03/29/2012 05:00 AM, r-devel-requ...@r-project.org wrote:
The 'No visible binding for global variable" is a good example. This
found some bugs in my 'survey' package, which I removed. There is
still one note of this type, which arises when I have to handle two
different versions of the hexbin
On Mar 29, 2012, at 14:58 , Brian G. Peterson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 16:52 +1300, Thomas Lumley wrote:
>> The 'No visible binding for global variable" is a good example. This
>> found some bugs in my 'survey' package, which I removed. There is
>> still one note of this type, which arises
That sounds like a job for recursion.
And also, a question for r-help and not r-devel.
Sarah
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Dai, Hongying, wrote:
> Dear R users,
>
> I'm wondering how I can generate an arbitrary number of loops in R.
> For instance, I can generate two "for" loops to get ICC a
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 16:52 +1300, Thomas Lumley wrote:
> The 'No visible binding for global variable" is a good example. This
> found some bugs in my 'survey' package, which I removed. There is
> still one note of this type, which arises when I have to handle two
> different versions of the hexbi
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:52 PM, Thomas Lumley wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Gabor Grothendieck
> wrote:
>> 2012/3/28 Uwe Ligges :
>>>
>>>
>>> On 27.03.2012 20:33, Jeffrey Ryan wrote:
Thanks Uwe for the clarification on what goes and what stays.
Still fuzzy on the
Dear R users,
I'm wondering how I can generate an arbitrary number of loops in R.
For instance, I can generate two "for" loops to get ICC among any two-way
combination among 10 variables. Here is the code
n<-10
for (i in 1:(n-1))
{
for (j in (i+1):n)
{
icc(cbind(DATA[,i],DATA[,j]))
}
}
If I need
22 matches
Mail list logo
