Running R CMD check on a package can take quite a lot of time. Checks
seem like they could be run in parallel (separate processes for, e.g.,
codoc, examples, tests, ...). Is there a way to do this? My current
usage is typically
R CMD build
R CMD check pkg_x.y.z.tar.gz
Thanks for any hi
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 12:21 -0500, Sarah Goslee wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm one of the maintainers of the r-sig-ecology list, and I think
> it would be entirely appropriate to include hydrology within
> the scope of the list.
I also agree. It was always the intention AFAICR for the R-SIG-Ecology
list
On 16/02/12 12:51, Sarah Goslee wrote:
Dear Martin,
Thank you for confirming what I'd already suspected
about the mailing list software.
What a pity that is not possible, but thank you very much Martin for
confirming and explaining why is not possible.
I've added hydrology explicitly to t
Dear Martin,
Thank you for confirming what I'd already suspected
about the mailing list software.
I've added hydrology explicitly to the list description, and
hope that the hydrologists find it a welcoming home. We've
got a solid core of participants, so R users should
find it a useful resource.
Hi,
I'm the "site maintainer" of the r-sig-...@r-project.org mailing
lists (and back from vacations).
> Sarah Goslee
> on Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:16:01 -0500 writes:
> Hi all,
>> It would be great if Sara of someone of the maintainers
>> of the r-sig-ecology list could add t
