Thank you for your reply, Peter. But that didn't work either. Continuing
the example:
setGeneric("unique")
setMethod("unique", "foo", function(x, incomparables = FALSE, ...){
y <- callNextMethod(x = getDataPart(x), incomparables = incomparables,
...)
new("foo", y)
})
> unique(bar)
Sharpie wrote
>
> If not, would it work to move the function call into a C function that
> uses `eval` inside a block protected by BEGIN_SUSPEND_INTERRUPTS?
>
Just to clarify, if there is no functionality at the R level for evaluating
an expression without interrupts, would it be possible to cr
Is there a way to suspend user interrupts for the duration of a function
call? There is a point in one of my packages where values are being written
to a Filehash database. If the user is unlucky enough to send an interrupt
while this code is active, then they have to:
- Hunt down a lock file an
On Jan 23, 2012, at 16:07 , Dan Murphy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 'factor' returns for my S4 object when the class is given an
> "as.character" method. Here is a minimal example:
>
>> setClass("foo", contains="numeric")
>> bar <- new("foo", 12)
>> factor(bar)
> [1] 12
> Levels: 12
>> setMethod("as.ch
Hello,
'factor' returns for my S4 object when the class is given an
"as.character" method. Here is a minimal example:
> setClass("foo", contains="numeric")
> bar <- new("foo", 12)
> factor(bar)
[1] 12
Levels: 12
> setMethod("as.character", "foo", function(x) paste("x=", x@.Data))
[1] "as.charact
