--- On Sat, 15/10/11, Simon Urbanek wrote:
> Thanks, now fixed. It affected almost
> all connections.
> Simon
Many thanks. Hopefully having gctorture() working would help - am having heap
corruption problems and valgrind aborts :-).
> On Oct 15, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
>
> > Fo
Thanks, now fixed. It affected almost all connections.
Simon
On Oct 15, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
> Found the simpliest way of seeing I bug I encountered doing "R CMD check
> --use-gct": Just launch R (with --vanilla), and do this:
>
>> ?gctorture
> # this work
>> gctorture()
>> ?
--- On Sat, 15/10/11, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
> Found the simpliest way of seeing I
> bug I encountered doing "R CMD check --use-gct": Just launch
> R (with --vanilla), and do this:
>
> > ?gctorture
> # this work
> > gctorture()
> > ?gctorture
> Error in gzfile(file, "rb") :
> can only weakly re
Found the simpliest way of seeing I bug I encountered doing "R CMD check
--use-gct": Just launch R (with --vanilla), and do this:
> ?gctorture
# this work
> gctorture()
> ?gctorture
Error in gzfile(file, "rb") :
can only weakly reference/finalize reference objects
# this does not
It seems th
- Original Message -
> The thing that happens during the check is that the methods package is
> not among the automatically loaded and attached packages.
>
> When the pkgB packages is attached, the Namespaces of pkgA and methods
> are loaded but not attached.
>
> Note that one of the ch
The thing that happens during the check is that the methods package is
not among the automatically loaded and attached packages.
When the pkgB packages is attached, the Namespaces of pkgA and methods
are loaded but not attached.
Note that one of the checks tells you:
"A namespace must be abl
On 15.10.2011 02:53, Hervé Pagès wrote:
On 11-10-14 05:47 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
On 11-10-14 05:46 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
[...]
I've put 2 toy packages here that illustrate the problem:
https://rapidshare.com/files/4043144391/pkgA_1.0.tar.gz
https://rapidshare.com/files/1959508331/pkgB_1.0
On 14/10/2011 7:51 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
Hi,
Wouldn't it be awesome if package.skeleton() could be used to
produce, well... a package skeleton? In a fresh R session:
Empty packages are almost identical, differing only in the name entry in
the DESCRIPTION file. So why not do this once manual
On 15/10/2011 2:52 AM, Jari Oksanen wrote:
Hello folks,
To get it short, I cut out most of the spurious controversy, and go to the
key point (and it also helps to go to sauna and then sleep well all night):
On 14/10/11 22:30 PM, "Uwe Ligges" wrote:
>
> Also note that the package would be acc
