On Aug 25, 2011, at 5:40 PM, Lokkju Brennr wrote:
> Simon,
>
> I wasn't trying to claim that JRI *couldn't* be licensed under LGPL
> (though if it sounded that way, I understand - I was a bit unclear),
> but rather that it made no sense, as there is no way to use JRI under
> the LGPL, since it m
Simon,
I wasn't trying to claim that JRI *couldn't* be licensed under LGPL
(though if it sounded that way, I understand - I was a bit unclear),
but rather that it made no sense, as there is no way to use JRI under
the LGPL, since it must always be linked with R to be of any use - and
that linking
On Aug 19, 2011, at 10:26 PM, Lokkju Brennr wrote:
> Hoping someone can clear up a licencing question...
>
> My understanding is that R is licensed under the GPL, with some
> headers licensed under the LGPL (per COPYRIGHTS, so that R plugins
> don't have to be GPL - arguably incorrect, but besid
