Hi,
On 11-07-04 05:08 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
There was an R-core meeting the week before last, and various planned
changes will appear in R-devel over the next few weeks.
These are changes planned for R 2.14.0 scheduled for Oct 31. As we are
sick of people referring to R-devel as '2.14' o
Thanks Steve and Brian !
Probably, I will create a gmail account for mailing lists and let it
take care of the threading.
Regards,
Saravanan
On 07/07/2011 12:02 PM, Brian G. Peterson wrote:
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 11:44 -0500, Saravanan wrote:
Hello,
I am passive reader of both R-devel and R
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 11:44 -0500, Saravanan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am passive reader of both R-devel and R-help mailing lists. I am
> sending the following comments to r-devel as it seemed more suitable. I
> am aware that this list uses GNU mailman for the list management. I have
> my options s
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Saravanan
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am passive reader of both R-devel and R-help mailing lists. I am sending
> the following comments to r-devel as it seemed more suitable. I am aware
> that this list uses GNU mailman for the list management. I have my options
> s
Hello,
I am passive reader of both R-devel and R-help mailing lists. I am
sending the following comments to r-devel as it seemed more suitable. I
am aware that this list uses GNU mailman for the list management. I have
my options set that it sends a email digest. One thing I find is that
the
On Jul 7, 2011, at 3:39 AM, Eli Holmes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been building R packages for awhile on Windows, and I recently
> upgraded R and all required package creation tools to 2.13.0. I
> understand that there have been changes in that the R CMD build
> command no longer alters the source
Hi,
I have been building R packages for awhile on Windows, and I recently
upgraded R and all required package creation tools to 2.13.0. I
understand that there have been changes in that the R CMD build
command no longer alters the source directory, cf comments in
http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R
On 07/07/2011 3:38 AM, mark.braving...@csiro.au wrote:
Thank you Duncan for those reassurances. I still have a couple of questions, as
below, but there was definitely some good news for me in your replies:
- IIUC , the "source" attribute will still be available for everything,
provided R_KEE
Hi Kasper
FWIW, the package development and maintenance support in 'mvbutils' makes it
trivial to work with namespaced packages, even at the earliest stages of
development. It's completely easy to add and remove functions to/from the
namespace (and the exported visible bit) while the package is
Thank you Duncan for those reassurances. I still have a couple of questions, as
below, but there was definitely some good news for me in your replies:
- IIUC , the "source" attribute will still be available for everything,
provided R_KEEP_PKG_SOURCE=yes (I am not so worried about srcrefs)
-
10 matches
Mail list logo
