Re: [Rd] Using GSL Routines

2011-04-13 Thread robin hankin
Hi the gsl R package includes many wrappers which you may find useful, but if you write new ones please let me know and I'll include them in a future release. best wishes Robin On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Mohit Dayal wrote: > Dear R-programmers, > > I am trying out certain methods in R, a

[Rd] Using GSL Routines

2011-04-13 Thread Mohit Dayal
Dear R-programmers, I am trying out certain methods in R, and the statistics require me to calculate n-(sample size) dimensional equations. They are not really very hard to solve - my home-brew implentation of Newton-Raphson in R succeeds most of time with simulated data. (Note that I am assured o

Re: [Rd] Problem with dyn.load in R 2.13.0 -- the real problem

2011-04-13 Thread Kasper Daniel Hansen
Terry You may not be aware of this, but the "new" default in R is to use a user library which is architecture and R-version dependent. Ie. if you do not play around with R_USER_LIBS or .Rprofile, functions like R CMD INSTALL or install.packages will default to something like (from my current vers

Re: [Rd] Problem with dyn.load in R 2.13.0

2011-04-13 Thread Terry Therneau
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 16:45 -0400, Simon Urbanek wrote: > We have no details, but my wild guess would be that you did not > re-build the package for 2.13.0 and you have static libR in 2.13.0 yet > dynamic in 2.12.2. > > Cheers, > Simon > Per my prior note, my guess at the root of the issue is u

Re: [Rd] Problem with dyn.load in R 2.13.0 -- the real problem

2011-04-13 Thread Simon Urbanek
On Apr 13, 2011, at 4:47 PM, Terry Therneau wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 15:32 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: >> Terry, >> >> You replied to >> >> From: Terry Therneau >> To: Dirk Eddelbuettel >> Cc: c...@r-project.org >> Subject: Re: [Rd] Problem with dyn.load in R 2.13.0 -- the re

Re: [Rd] Problem with dyn.load in R 2.13.0 -- the real problem

2011-04-13 Thread Terry Therneau
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 15:32 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > Terry, > > You replied to > > From: Terry Therneau > To: Dirk Eddelbuettel > Cc: c...@r-project.org > Subject: Re: [Rd] Problem with dyn.load in R 2.13.0 -- the real problem > > but dropped r-devel. On purpose? No, not on

Re: [Rd] Problem with dyn.load in R 2.13.0

2011-04-13 Thread Simon Urbanek
We have no details, but my wild guess would be that you did not re-build the package for 2.13.0 and you have static libR in 2.13.0 yet dynamic in 2.12.2. Cheers, Simon On Apr 13, 2011, at 2:00 PM, Terry Therneau wrote: > I have a test directory for the survival suite, and dyn.load has ceased >

Re: [Rd] Problem with dyn.load in R 2.13.0

2011-04-13 Thread Martin Morgan
On 04/13/2011 11:34 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 13 April 2011 at 13:00, Terry Therneau wrote: | I have a test directory for the survival suite, and dyn.load has ceased | to work in it. Below shows the log: | | tmt1075% R --vanilla | | R version 2.12.2 (2011-02-25) | Copyright (C) 2011 The R

Re: [Rd] Problem with dyn.load in R 2.13.0

2011-04-13 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 13 April 2011 at 13:00, Terry Therneau wrote: | I have a test directory for the survival suite, and dyn.load has ceased | to work in it. Below shows the log: | | tmt1075% R --vanilla | | R version 2.12.2 (2011-02-25) | Copyright (C) 2011 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing | ISBN 3-90

[Rd] Problem with dyn.load in R 2.13.0

2011-04-13 Thread Terry Therneau
I have a test directory for the survival suite, and dyn.load has ceased to work in it. Below shows the log: tmt1075% R --vanilla R version 2.12.2 (2011-02-25) Copyright (C) 2011 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing ISBN 3-900051-07-0 Platform: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (64-bit) R is free s

Re: [Rd] R CMD build --resave-data

2011-04-13 Thread Hervé Pagès
Hi Uwe, On 11-04-13 10:50 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote: On 13.04.2011 02:53, Hervé Pagès wrote: Hi Uwe, On 11-04-11 08:13 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote: On 11.04.2011 02:47, Hervé Pagès wrote: Hi, More about the new --resave-data option As mentioned previously here https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-dev

Re: [Rd] R CMD build --resave-data

2011-04-13 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 13.04.2011 02:53, Hervé Pagès wrote: Hi Uwe, On 11-04-11 08:13 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote: On 11.04.2011 02:47, Hervé Pagès wrote: Hi, More about the new --resave-data option As mentioned previously here https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2011-April/060511.html 'R CMD build' and 'R CM

Re: [Rd] Reading 64-bit integers

2011-04-13 Thread Jon Clayden
Simon (et al.), I was just wondering if anything further came of this... I would be willing to help put together an updated patch, if the semantics can be decided upon. All the best, Jon On 30 March 2011 19:22, Simon Urbanek wrote: > Bill, > > thanks. I like that idea of the output parameter b

Re: [Rd] bug in hist.POSIXt , hist.Date

2011-04-13 Thread Ben Bolker
Joris Meys gmail.com> writes: > > The behaviour of hist.POSIXt when using the col argument is different > from the default hist, in the respect that it colors the axes as well. > I think this is due to the ... argument, which is passed to the > axis.POSIXct() function. In the default hist, col i

[Rd] bug in hist.POSIXt , hist.Date

2011-04-13 Thread Joris Meys
The behaviour of hist.POSIXt when using the col argument is different from the default hist, in the respect that it colors the axes as well. I think this is due to the ... argument, which is passed to the axis.POSIXct() function. In the default hist, col is set as a fixed argument, and hence cannot

Re: [Rd] Excited about the near future...

2011-04-13 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
Since I've posted this a month ago, several persons have been emailing me offline asking what I'm referring to. From the NEWS of R v2.13.0 (released today): Package 'compiler' is now provided as a standard package. See ?compiler::compile for information on how to use the compiler. This package im

Re: [Rd] R CMD build --resave-data

2011-04-13 Thread Martin Maechler
> Hervé Pagès > on Tue, 12 Apr 2011 22:21:58 -0700 writes: > On 11-04-12 07:06 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote: >> >> On Apr 12, 2011, at 8:53 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote: >> >>> Hi Uwe, >>> >>> On 11-04-11 08:13 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote: On 1