Hi,
in Section 'Writing package vignettes' of 'Writing R Extensions' it says:
"Whenever a Makefile is found, then R CMD build will try to run make
after the Sweave runs, so PDF manuals can be created from arbitrary
source formats (plain LaTeX files, ...). [...] Note that the make step
is executed
Hi,
I made the GotoBLAS2 for OSX version.
two binaries are divided by kind of powerPC.
neither binaries are different on Intel.
because there is not PPC, I can't confirm it.
http://prs.ism.ac.jp/~nakama/SurviveGotoBLAS2/binary/OSX/
2011/2/10 Ei-ji Nakama :
> Hi,
>
> I put below Rblas.dll(GotoBLA
Dan,
the Windows build of R has no back-end choices, so the error essentially comes
from a system call which means that Windows simply cannot provide the
resources. Have you tried let's say Cairo alternative on the same machine? [If
you want to test it, please use install.packages("Cairo",,"htt
I forgot to mention, on the machine where the png() command below does not
work, the output of capabilities() is:
> capabilities()
jpeg png tifftcltk X11 aqua http/ftp sockets
TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUEFALSEFALSE TRUE TRUE
libxml fifo cled
On Mar 29, 2011, at 8:47 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 29/03/2011 7:01 PM, Jon Clayden wrote:
>> Dear Simon,
>>
>> On 29 March 2011 22:40, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>>> Jon,
>>>
>>> On Mar 29, 2011, at 1:33 PM, Jon Clayden wrote:
>>>
Dear Simon,
Thank you for the response.
>
Hello,
I encountered this:
> png(file=tempfile(), width=1165, height=12983)
Error in png(file = tempfile(), width = 1165, height = 12983) :
unable to start png() device
In addition: Warning messages:
1: In png(file = tempfile(), width = 1165, height = 12983) :
Unable to allocate bitmap
2: In
On 29/03/2011 7:01 PM, Jon Clayden wrote:
Dear Simon,
On 29 March 2011 22:40, Simon Urbanek wrote:
Jon,
On Mar 29, 2011, at 1:33 PM, Jon Clayden wrote:
Dear Simon,
Thank you for the response.
On 29 March 2011 15:06, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Mar 29, 2011, at 8:46 AM, Jon Clayden wrote:
Dear Simon,
On 29 March 2011 22:40, Simon Urbanek wrote:
> Jon,
>
> On Mar 29, 2011, at 1:33 PM, Jon Clayden wrote:
>
>> Dear Simon,
>>
>> Thank you for the response.
>>
>> On 29 March 2011 15:06, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mar 29, 2011, at 8:46 AM, Jon Clayden wrote:
>>>
Dear all,
>>>
Jon,
On Mar 29, 2011, at 1:33 PM, Jon Clayden wrote:
> Dear Simon,
>
> Thank you for the response.
>
> On 29 March 2011 15:06, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 29, 2011, at 8:46 AM, Jon Clayden wrote:
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I see from some previous threads that support for 64-bit integer
The HTML link 'Customizing package compilation' in 'Writing R
Extensions' is broken. See the offending link near here:
http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-exts.html#Submitting-a-package-to-CRAN
In R-exts.texi, it looks like a five-argument @xref was intended. Oddly,
the PDF link works anywa
> -Original Message-
> From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
> [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Jon Clayden
> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 5:46 AM
> To: r-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: [Rd] Reading 64-bit integers
>
> Dear all,
>
> I see from some previous threads tha
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Hin-Tak Leung
wrote:
> Martin Maechler wrote:
>>>
>>> Douglas Bates
>>> on Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:24:39 -0500 writes:
>>
>> > Can you provide the output from sessionInfo()
>>
>> > so we can know the platform? Also, did you configure R
>> > wi
Hi,
On 03/29/2011 01:24 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011, William Dunlap wrote:
[...]
(The name rowsum is a metabug, since it may be confused
with the entirely different rowSums, but it has been around
for a long time.)
A lot longer than rowSums ...
Another problem with t
On 29/03/2011 1:31 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
Hi,
With R version 2.13.0 alpha (2011-03-24 r55004), 'R CMD check' will
produce the following output on some packages:
* checking Rd metadata ... WARNING
Error in is.function(FUN) : 'FUN' is missing
Calls: print ... format.check_Rd_metadata
Dear Simon,
Thank you for the response.
On 29 March 2011 15:06, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>
> On Mar 29, 2011, at 8:46 AM, Jon Clayden wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I see from some previous threads that support for 64-bit integers in R
>> may be an aim for future versions, but in the meantime I'm wonde
Hi,
With R version 2.13.0 alpha (2011-03-24 r55004), 'R CMD check' will
produce the following output on some packages:
* checking Rd metadata ... WARNING
Error in is.function(FUN) : 'FUN' is missing
Calls: print ... format.check_Rd_metadata -> unlist -> lapply ->
match.fun
Execution ha
On Mar 29, 2011, at 8:46 AM, Jon Clayden wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I see from some previous threads that support for 64-bit integers in R
> may be an aim for future versions, but in the meantime I'm wondering
> whether it is possible to read in integers of greater than 32 bits at
> all. Judging fro
> with the entirely different rowSums, but it has been around
> for a long time.)
A lot longer than rowSums ...
> Bill Dunlap
> Spotfire, TIBCO Software
---
This made me smile. The rowsums function was originally an internal
part of the survival package, used for
Dear all,
I see from some previous threads that support for 64-bit integers in R
may be an aim for future versions, but in the meantime I'm wondering
whether it is possible to read in integers of greater than 32 bits at
all. Judging from ?readBin, it should be possible to read 8-byte
integers to s
Martin Maechler wrote:
Douglas Bates
on Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:24:39 -0500 writes:
> Can you provide the output from sessionInfo()
> so we can know the platform? Also, did you configure R
> with --enable-strict-barrier or set the C compilation flag
> -DTESTING_WRITE_BARRIER?
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011, William Dunlap wrote:
(a) In R 2.12.2 rowsum can overflow if given an integer input:
> rowsum(c(2e9L, 2e9L), c("a", "a"))
[,1]
a -294967296
> 2^32 + .Last.value
[,1]
a 4e+09
Should it be changed to coerce its x argument to numeric
(double precision) so it al
21 matches
Mail list logo
