On Feb 6, 2011, at 8:10 PM, Paul Murrell wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 3/02/2011 1:23 p.m., Simon Urbanek wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 2, 2011, at 7:00 PM, Paul Murrell wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Martin Maechler wrote:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 23:30, Simon
Urbanek wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2011, at 8:16 PM,
Hi
On 3/02/2011 1:23 p.m., Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Feb 2, 2011, at 7:00 PM, Paul Murrell wrote:
Hi
Martin Maechler wrote:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 23:30, Simon
Urbanek wrote:
On Feb 1, 2011, at 8:16 PM, Paul Murrell wrote:
Hi
On 2/02/2011 2:03 p.m., Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1
On 06.02.2011 18:24 (UTC+1), Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Sun, 6 Feb 2011, Rainer Hurling wrote:
On 06.02.2011 16:22 (UTC+1), Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Sun, 6 Feb 2011, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Today I tried two build R-devel_2011-02-06.tar.gz from sources on
FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT (amd64) with g
On 06.02.2011 18:24 (UTC+1), Murray Stokely wrote:
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Rainer Hurling wrote:
I think this is really a FreeBSD support question. In 2011, an OS really
should have support for a 1999 standard. Darwin, a FreeBSD derivative,
does and its help page says
Hmm, on FreeBSD
On Sun, 6 Feb 2011, Murray Stokely wrote:
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Rainer Hurling wrote:
I think this is really a FreeBSD support question. In 2011, an OS really
should have support for a 1999 standard. Darwin, a FreeBSD derivative,
does and its help page says
Hmm, on FreeBSD I really
On Sun, 6 Feb 2011, Rainer Hurling wrote:
On 06.02.2011 16:22 (UTC+1), Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Sun, 6 Feb 2011, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Today I tried two build R-devel_2011-02-06.tar.gz from sources on
FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT (amd64) with gcc-4.5.2 and I got the following
messages when configur
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Murray Stokely wrote:
> Yes, please mail freebsd-standa...@google.com
Ugh, that should be freebsd-standa...@freebsd.org of course. Silly brain-o.
- Murray
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Rainer Hurling wrote:
>> I think this is really a FreeBSD support question. In 2011, an OS really
>> should have support for a 1999 standard. Darwin, a FreeBSD derivative,
>> does and its help page says
>
> Hmm, on FreeBSD I really have no other piece of software wh
On 06.02.2011 16:22 (UTC+1), Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Sun, 6 Feb 2011, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Today I tried two build R-devel_2011-02-06.tar.gz from sources on
FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT (amd64) with gcc-4.5.2 and I got the following
messages when configuring:
./configure
[..SNIP..]
checking wheth
On Sun, 6 Feb 2011, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Today I tried two build R-devel_2011-02-06.tar.gz from sources on FreeBSD
9.0-CURRENT (amd64) with gcc-4.5.2 and I got the following messages when
configuring:
./configure
[..SNIP..]
checking whether C99 double complex is supported...
checking comple
Today I tried two build R-devel_2011-02-06.tar.gz from sources on
FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT (amd64) with gcc-4.5.2 and I got the following
messages when configuring:
./configure
[..SNIP..]
checking whether C99 double complex is supported...
checking complex.h usability... yes
checking complex.h pres
11 matches
Mail list logo