Re: [Rd] ReferenceClasses examples {method}

2011-01-28 Thread John Chambers
Hi Marc, Sort of one out of two, but very helpful. On 1/28/11 11:01 AM, Marc Carpentier wrote: Dear r-devel-list, dear John Chambers, I'm trying to learn OOP-possibilities in R and I was going through the documentation 'ReferenceClasses {methods}' (great work, by the way...). Reading associate

[Rd] ReferenceClasses examples {method}

2011-01-28 Thread Marc Carpentier
Dear r-devel-list, dear John Chambers, I'm trying to learn OOP-possibilities in R and I was going through the documentation 'ReferenceClasses {methods}' (great work, by the way...). Reading associated Examples, something bothers me : it seems to me that there are errors in 'edit' and 'undo' meth

Re: [Rd] use of depends, suggests, etc

2011-01-28 Thread Kevin R. Coombes
The situation I am talking about is essentially the one in your example. If package [Bar] is not installed on the machine where R CMD chedk is running, then putting Suggests: Bar in the DESCRIPTION file causes R CMD check to fail, with the error message * checking package dependencies .

Re: [Rd] trojan at current development version?

2011-01-28 Thread Ben Bolker
Uwe Ligges statistik.tu-dortmund.de> writes: > > > On 28.01.2011 13:49, peter dalgaard wrote: > > > > On Jan 28, 2011, at 09:47 , Andreas Mayr wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> is it possible, that the current development version for Windows ( > >> http://cran.at.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/R-2

Re: [Rd] help with S4 objects: trying to use a "link-glm" as a class in an object definition

2011-01-28 Thread Martin Morgan
On 01/27/2011 08:51 PM, Paul Bailey wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to make a new S4 object with a slot for a "link-glm" object. R > doesn't like me have a slot of class "link-glm" > >> class(make.link("probit")) > [1] "link-glm" Tell the S4 system that you'd like to use this 'old' class setOldCla

Re: [Rd] trojan at current development version?

2011-01-28 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 28.01.2011 13:49, peter dalgaard wrote: On Jan 28, 2011, at 09:47 , Andreas Mayr wrote: Hi, is it possible, that the current development version for Windows ( http://cran.at.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/R-2.13.0dev-win.exe) is infected by a trojan/virus. My antivir-program (www.avira.

Re: [Rd] trojan at current development version?

2011-01-28 Thread peter dalgaard
On Jan 28, 2011, at 09:47 , Andreas Mayr wrote: > Hi, > > is it possible, that the current development version for Windows ( > http://cran.at.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/R-2.13.0dev-win.exe) is > infected by a trojan/virus. My antivir-program (www.avira.com) seems to find > a trojan in open.

[Rd] trojan at current development version?

2011-01-28 Thread Andreas Mayr
Hi, is it possible, that the current development version for Windows ( http://cran.at.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/R-2.13.0dev-win.exe) is infected by a trojan/virus. My antivir-program (www.avira.com) seems to find a trojan in open.exe at bin\i386. Best regards, Andreas [[alternative

[Rd] Possible bug in cut.dendrogram when there are only 2 leaves in the tree ?

2011-01-28 Thread Karl Forner
Hello, I noticed a behavior ot the cut() function that does not seem right. In a dendrogram with only 2 leaves in one cluster, if you cut() at a height above this cluster, you end up with 2 cut clusters, one for each leaf, instead of one. But it seems to work fine for dendrograms with more than 2