Tests and examples are different things. The fact that your example runs
only means that your code does not bomb on execution and not that it runs
correctly. Plus, the code in examples is meant as an aid to the user; a way
to help them understand how to use your code. Proper tests are there
On 1/18/2011 8:44 AM, Dominick Samperi wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Claudia Beleiteswrote:
On 01/18/2011 01:13 AM, Dominick Samperi wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Spencer Graves<
spencer.gra...@structuremonitoring.com> wrote:
Hi, Dominick, et al.:
Demanding co
I already had a solution under test, so the bug is now fixed and
closed.
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 17/01/2011 5:06 PM, Philip Johnson wrote:
I have run into a potential bug somewhere between format (specifically
scientific notation) and plotmath that results in displaying:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Claudia Beleites wrote:
> On 01/18/2011 01:13 AM, Dominick Samperi wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Spencer Graves<
>> spencer.gra...@structuremonitoring.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Dominick, et al.:
>>>
>>>
>>> Demanding complete unit test suites with
Hi Professor Brian :
I buy a new 64bit Win7 Home basic notebook for working with 64bit R
and PostgreSQL :)
but still now I can't get postgresql-9.0.2-1-windows_x64 installed.
Which version of Win 7 and postgres do you use, can you share the
download URL for 9.0.0.1 of 64bit PostgreSQL, I can't
On 17/01/2011 5:06 PM, Philip Johnson wrote:
I have run into a potential bug somewhere between format (specifically
scientific notation) and plotmath that results in displaying:
$1e+01^{2e+00}$
instead of
$10^2$
Reproduce by:
plot.new()
a=format(10, scientific=TRU
I have run into a potential bug somewhere between format (specifically
scientific notation) and plotmath that results in displaying:
$1e+01^{2e+00}$
instead of
$10^2$
Reproduce by:
plot.new()
a=format(10, scientific=TRUE)
mtext(expression(10^2), line=1) #
Claudia,
I think we agree.
Having the examples run in the
tests is a good thing, I think.
They might strengthen the tests
some (especially if there are
no other tests). But mainly if
examples don't work, then it's
hard to have much faith in the
code.
On 18/01/2011 11:36, Claudia Beleites wrote
On 01/18/2011 10:53 AM, Patrick Burns wrote:
I'm not at all a fan of thinking
of the examples as being tests.
Examples should clarify the thinking
of potential users. Tests should
clarify the space in which the code
is correct. These two goals are
generally at odds.
Patrick, I completely agree
I'm not at all a fan of thinking
of the examples as being tests.
Examples should clarify the thinking
of potential users. Tests should
clarify the space in which the code
is correct. These two goals are
generally at odds.
On 17/01/2011 22:15, Spencer Graves wrote:
Hi, Paul:
The "Writing R E
On 01/18/2011 01:13 AM, Dominick Samperi wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Spencer Graves<
spencer.gra...@structuremonitoring.com> wrote:
Hi, Dominick, et al.:
Demanding complete unit test suites with all software contributed to
CRAN would likely cut contributions by a factor of
11 matches
Mail list logo
