Re: [Rd] Competing with one's own work

2010-12-05 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 03/12/2010 4:08 PM, Ben Bolker wrote: Ravi Varadhan jhmi.edu> writes: "The decision about whether it belongs in a package or in base R is about who should maintain the code." Ok. I understand it now. Thanks, Ravi. A point that may not have been made (sorry if it was and I missed

Re: [Rd] SurviveGotoBLAS2 for Win64 (human sacrifice release)

2010-12-05 Thread Ei-ji Nakama
Hi, 2010/12/5 Prof Brian Ripley : > However, like most BLAS this is tied to a particular chip (you don't say what >you > used: my machine is identified as penryn) and I am undecided if it is worth > provided a range of pre-compiled GotoBLAS2 Rblas.dll (or how wide the range > would need to be to

Re: [Rd] SurviveGotoBLAS2 for Win64 (human sacrifice release)

2010-12-05 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
Ei-ji, Thank you for looking into this. I had also noticed that GotoBLAS2 now has a compatible licence and started looking into using it on Windows. However, like most BLAS this is tied to a particular chip (you don't say what you used: my machine is identified as penryn) and I am undecided