Thank you Romain.
This ends the thread.
I will post comments/questions about your planned changes to rcpp-devel.
Regards,
Dominick
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Romain Francois
wrote:
> Dear Dominick,
>
> Thank you so much for the numerous reminders about this request of yours.
>
> You will
Dear Dominick,
Thank you so much for the numerous reminders about this request of yours.
You will be pleased to know that as part of our ongoing search for
quality, the current development version of the Rcpp package no longer
contains code from what we call the `classic Rcpp' API. We owe this
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Michael Sumner wrote:
> Christ, can we remove all references from the mailing lists while we're at
> it?
>
Look, I want to release software to CRAN, and I would like to
do it without having to explain those remarks in Rcpp. I understand
your frustration, but the a
John, thanks for starting (or restarting) this thread. I'd like to
add to the discussion with another concrete example, about as simple
as it gets, which may help focus at least part of this discussion.
I have worked with Taylor Arnold to implement a method developed in
Conover (1972) for Kolmogo
Christ, can we remove all references from the mailing lists while we're at it?
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Dominick Samperi wrote:
> Dirk,
>
> Please let me know whether or not you will comply with my request to remove
> references to my name in Rcpp (except copyright notices).
>
> Thanks,
Hi,
I put below Rblas.dll(GotoBLAS2 for Win64).
http://prs.ism.ac.jp/~nakama/SurviveGotoBLAS2/binary/windows/x64/Rblas.dll
It's a tryal phase.
--
EI-JI Nakama
"\u4e2d\u9593\u6804\u6cbb"
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/ma
