On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Duncan Temple Lang wrote:
Hi Jun
On 12/3/10 2:15 PM, Zhang,Jun wrote:
I have 64-bit R 2 12 0 installed on Solaris 10 of Sun Sparc. When I tried to
install RCurl, it failed with the following lines,
...
Version has CURLOPT_SSL_SESSIONID_CACHE
libcurl version:
Hi Jun
On 12/3/10 2:15 PM, Zhang,Jun wrote:
> I have 64-bit R 2 12 0 installed on Solaris 10 of Sun Sparc. When I tried to
> install RCurl, it failed with the following lines,
>
> ...
> Version has CURLOPT_SSL_SESSIONID_CACHE
> libcurl version: libcurl 7.19.6
> configure: creating .
I have 64-bit R 2 12 0 installed on Solaris 10 of Sun Sparc. When I tried to
install RCurl, it failed with the following lines,
...
Version has CURLOPT_SSL_SESSIONID_CACHE
libcurl version: libcurl 7.19.6
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating src/Makevars
** libs
Ravi Varadhan jhmi.edu> writes:
>
> "The decision about whether it belongs in a package or in base R is
> about who should maintain the code."
>
> Ok. I understand it now.
>
> Thanks,
> Ravi.
>
A point that may not have been made (sorry if it was and I missed it):
A better question m
Dirk,
Please let me know whether or not you will comply with my request to remove
references to my name in Rcpp (except copyright notices).
Thanks,
Dominick
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Dominick Samperi wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
>>
>> On 2 Decem
At one time I lobbied for putting something in base or a required package, and
it was suggested that the idea at the time was to remove things rather than add
them. Generally, I agree that is a good idea, so I did not lobby more.
When this question comes up it is always asked, and answered, in
"The decision about whether it belongs in a package or in base R is
about who should maintain the code."
Ok. I understand it now.
Thanks,
Ravi.
---
Ravi Varadhan, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor,
Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology Sch
On 03/12/2010 12:01 PM, Ravi Varadhan wrote:
Dear Duncan,
What constitutes a convincing argument for making significant changes?
I don't think there's any answer to that other than "an argument that
convinces someone to make the changes". What would convince you to work
on a problem? Your
Dear Doug,
Thank you for the response.
"constrOptim is in the stats package, not the base package."
Yes, I know, and I meant to say base *distribution* rather than base
package.
"The burden of maintaining the code, fixing bugs or other infelicities, etc.
is on the package maintainer."
Of cou
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Ravi Varadhan wrote:
> Dear Duncan,
> What constitutes a convincing argument for making significant changes?
> Taking the example of optimization algorithms (say, for smooth objective
> functions), how does one make a convincing argument that a particular class
>
Dear Duncan,
What constitutes a convincing argument for making significant changes?
Taking the example of optimization algorithms (say, for smooth objective
functions), how does one make a convincing argument that a particular class
of algorithms are "better" than another class? This can be a dif
On 03/12/2010 10:57 AM, Prof. John C Nash wrote:
No, this is not about Rcpp, but a comment in that overly long discussion raised
a question
that has been in my mind for a while.
This is that one may have work that is used in R in the base functionality and
there are
improvements that should be
No, this is not about Rcpp, but a comment in that overly long discussion raised
a question
that has been in my mind for a while.
This is that one may have work that is used in R in the base functionality and
there are
improvements that should be incorporated.
For me, this concerns the BFGS, Nel
G'day Brian,
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:14:44 + (GMT)
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> > I noticed the following (new) behaviour of R 2.12.0, running on
> > Kubuntu 10.10, when installed with sub-architectures:
>
> Yes, there are new features when there are multiple sub-architectures.
Indeed. One ne
On 3 December 2010 at 08:46, Oleksandr Dyklevych wrote:
| I'm trying to speed up my R code by writing quite simple dll's in C. But I
Yes, that can be a very appropriate approach and many tools help. Make sure
you read the 'Writing R Extensions' manual though.
| faced some problems, and I cannot
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Berwin A Turlach wrote:
G'day all,
I noticed the following (new) behaviour of R 2.12.0, running on Kubuntu
10.10, when installed with sub-architectures:
Yes, there are new features when there are multiple sub-architectures.
When I run "R CMD INSTALL" or "R CMD check" on
Dear sir\madam!
I'm trying to speed up my R code by writing quite simple dll's in C. But I
faced some problems, and I cannot determine their source.
#include
SEXP mycombin(SEXP N, SEXP k){
int i, *j, *l, c;
j = INTEGER(k);l = INTEGER(N);
c = 1;
if(j[0] > 0 && j[0] < l[
G'day all,
I noticed the following (new) behaviour of R 2.12.0, running on Kubuntu
10.10, when installed with sub-architectures:
When I run "R CMD INSTALL" or "R CMD check" on the source directory of a
package that contains C or FORTRAN code, R creates sub-directories
src-32/ and src-64/ that see
Why do you think dependencies are not needed for the help system? At
some point they will be needed to resolve cross-references: at install
time if you are generating static HTML.
I've not seen any issues that cannot be solved by --install=fake: I
have fake installs of a few packages (e.g. ROr
19 matches
Mail list logo
