Re: [Rd] [R] Use of .Fortran

2010-06-19 Thread David Scott
Thanks very much to all who replied. I went with Brian's approach, and eventually, despite all my attempts to foul it up, I did get it to work successfully. For the record here are the details. The subroutine is: subroutine SSFcoef(nmax,nu,A) implicit double precision(a-h,o-z)

[Rd] more powerful iconv

2010-06-19 Thread Matt Shotwell
R community, As you may know, R's iconv doesn't work well converting to and from encodings that allow embedded nulls. For example > iconv("foo", to="UTF-16") Error in iconv("foo", to = "UTF-16") : embedded nul in string: '\xff\xfef\0o\0o\0' However, I don't believe embedded nulls are at issue

Re: [Rd] [R] Use of .Fortran

2010-06-19 Thread Sharpie
Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > > Well, it is not Fortran 77 but Fortran 95, and so needs to be given a > .f95 extension to be sure to work. > I think most compilers only distinguish two fortran file extensions: .f or .f90. .f denotes fixed-form source code while .f90 denotes free-form. Some com

Re: [Rd] C Interface

2010-06-19 Thread Daniel Cegiełka
I'm not a windows expert. You have C code file (not cc or cpp): > R CMD SHLIB OrthoFunctions.c and you use g++ compiler... ok, we can use c++ compiler for c.. but it's looks like c++ code with c code inside: > extern "C" { Try it without "extern "C" and with gcc compiler instead g++. regards,