On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, William Dunlap wrote:
Should both parts of a complex number be printed
to the same precision? The imaginary part of 0
looks a bit odd when log10(real/imag) >=~ getOption("digits"),
but I'm not sure it is awful. Some people might
expect the same number of significant digit
Should both parts of a complex number be printed
to the same precision? The imaginary part of 0
looks a bit odd when log10(real/imag) >=~ getOption("digits"),
but I'm not sure it is awful. Some people might
expect the same number of significant digits in the
two parts.
> 1e7+4i
[1] 1000+0i
On 24/03/2010 1:29 PM, jferr...@umces.edu wrote:
Hi All,
I'm writing R code that would benefit from doing certain tasks using
compiled blocks of code, specifically Fortran subroutines of my own
(already written, debugged in both Fortran77 and Fortran90).
I am currently working on a Windows mach
Hi All,
I'm writing R code that would benefit from doing certain tasks using
compiled blocks of code, specifically Fortran subroutines of my own
(already written, debugged in both Fortran77 and Fortran90).
I am currently working on a Windows machine using Lahey and/or MinGW(g77)
compilers.
It is
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 23/03/2010 1:28 PM, Bond, Stephen wrote:
Dear R developers,
Could you, please, point me to the source file containing the
implementation of NA values?
I have a feeling this isn't what you want, but what you asked for is in
https://svn.r-projec
On 23/03/2010 1:28 PM, Bond, Stephen wrote:
Dear R developers,
Could you, please, point me to the source file containing the implementation of
NA values?
I have a feeling this isn't what you want, but what you asked for is in
https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/src/main/arithmetic.c
in parti
