On Wed, 03-Mar-2010 at 07:53PM +1300, Patrick Connolly wrote:
|> I got Rmpi to compile with little difficulty, but had a tricky time
|> setting the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to use the OpenMPI libs. I now get a
|> different error when I try to load Rmpi
|>
|>
|> > require(Rmpi)
|> Loadi
I think the first question should be how to build a R function to call a bunch
of C ,C++ which include one main program, and a makefile. My goal to build a R
package will be next step.
I read Rcpp , I am not sure if RcppResultSet can solve my problem or other
function. Once I make sure it wor
On 5 March 2010 at 13:15, alex46...@yahoo.com wrote:
| Hope I can get quick help from here, I have a bunch of c, c++ included main
function and makefile. It works well on both UNIX and windows. I tried to build
R package which include this C++ program and several other R functions. These
R fun
Hi R-devels,
recently I wanted to quickly look up a C implementation
in R-Core code in the official subversion repository;
more specifically the code was called from R by means of the .Internal()
interface.
And: yes, I did read Uwe Ligges' article in R News,
R Help Desk: Accessing the sources.
Hope I can get quick help from here, I have a bunch of c, c++ included main
function and makefile. It works well on both UNIX and windows. I tried to build
R package which include this C++ program and several other R functions. These
R function here are independent of c++ code. I prefer to def
Hi folks, I'm having a problem with installing R on Solaris. Has anyone seen
a similar issue? I don't find any hits on the search engines. Thanks.
Environment:
SunOS 5.10 Generic_118822-25 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-280R
During the installation/compilation of R-2.10.1 I get the follow
Hi,
I have written an R translation of C.T. Kelley's Matlab version of the
Nelder-Mead algorithm. This algorithm is discussed in detail in his book
"Iterative methods for optimization" (SIAM 1999, Chapter 8). I have tested
this relatively extensively on a number of smooth and non-smooth probl
Sorry for one more email, but here is a more concise and pertinent "ranef"
example:
# Allow S4 methods to find S3 asreml objects
setOldClass("asreml")
if(!isGeneric("ranef")){
setGeneric("ranef", function(object, ...) standardGeneric("ranef"))
}
ranef.asreml <- function(obj){
effects <- obj$
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Andrew Redd wrote:
Is there a way that I can change the prompt for within a browser() call. I
often use use code like
with(obj1,browser())
Browse[1]>
Is there a way that I can set it so that I can get something like
with(obj1,browser(prompt="obj1"))
obj1[1]>
I know t
On 3/5/10 4:40 AM, Matthew Dowle wrote:
Thanks a lot. Quick and brief responses below...
"Duncan Murdoch" wrote in message
news:4b90f134.6070...@stats.uwo.ca...
Matthew Dowle wrote:
I was hoping for a 'yes', 'no', 'maybe' or 'bad idea because ...'. No
response resulted in a retry() after a S
On Mar 5, 2010, at 12:40 , Paul Gilbert wrote:
Is CRAN having trouble or is it just me?
CRAN consists of 70 servers (hence the "N" in the name) so the answer
is definitely it's you ;). Try using a different mirror - the ones I
tried are all very snappy so if that doesn't help it's your co
Is CRAN having trouble or is it just me? (The web interface is very
slow and install.packages() is timing out and giving me "service not
available").
Paul
La version française suit le texte anglais.
--
The coxme package has a ranef() method, as does lme4. I'm having
trouble getting them to play together, as shown below. (The particular
model in the example isn't defensible, but uses a standard data set.)
The problem is that most of the time only one of lme4 or coxme will be
loaded, so each nee
Is there a way that I can change the prompt for within a browser() call. I
often use use code like
> with(obj1,browser())
Browse[1]>
Is there a way that I can set it so that I can get something like
> with(obj1,browser(prompt="obj1"))
obj1[1]>
I know that prompt is not a valid option for brows
That appears to be an epistemic error. Some people, and I would agree it
seems like an increasing number of people, clearly don't read the posting
guide. However, it is impossible for anyone to know how many people do read
it, do thoroughly read it and, therefore, don't ever need to post to r-h
Thanks a lot. Quick and brief responses below...
"Duncan Murdoch" wrote in message
news:4b90f134.6070...@stats.uwo.ca...
> Matthew Dowle wrote:
>> I was hoping for a 'yes', 'no', 'maybe' or 'bad idea because ...'. No
>> response resulted in a retry() after a Sys.sleep(10 days).
>>
>> If its a
I don't think we should be expanding the posting guide. Its already
so long that no one reads it. We should be thinking of ways to cut it
down to a smaller size instead.
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Matthew Dowle wrote:
> Under the "further resources" section I'd like to suggest the followin
Matthew Dowle wrote:
I was hoping for a 'yes', 'no', 'maybe' or 'bad idea because ...'. No
response resulted in a retry() after a Sys.sleep(10 days).
If its a "yes" or "maybe" then I could proceed to try it, test it, and
present the test results and timings to you along with the patch. It wou
I was hoping for a 'yes', 'no', 'maybe' or 'bad idea because ...'. No
response resulted in a retry() after a Sys.sleep(10 days).
If its a "yes" or "maybe" then I could proceed to try it, test it, and
present the test results and timings to you along with the patch. It would
be on 32bit Ubuntu
Under the "further resources" section I'd like to suggest the following
addition :
* http://crantastic.org/ lists popular packages according to other users
votes. Consider briefly reviewing the top 30 packages before posting to
r-help since someone may have already released a package that solv
On Wed, 03-Mar-2010 at 01:57PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
[...]
|> You could try to suppress the probe for IB which we did (in the older 1.2.*
|> series of OpenMPI) via
|>
|># Disable the use of InfiniBand
|># btl = ^openib
|>btl = ^openib
|>
|> in /etc/openmpi/openmpi-mca-p
21 matches
Mail list logo
