Ben Bolker ufl.edu> writes:
[re: behavior of scale() when center=FALSE and scale=TRUE]
> Again, I agree with you that the behavior is not optimal, but it is
> very hard to make changes in R when the behavior is sub-optimal rather
> than actually wrong (by some definition). R-core is very con
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:58:16AM -0600, Marc Schwartz wrote:
...
> Jira was discussed a couple of years ago:
>
> http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e5/devel/08/09/0006.html
>
> I presume that the disposition towards non-FOSS platforms remains.
Was just an idea. IMHO the hosting team needs to
On Mar 4, 2010, at 14:44 , Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
Another possibility is to link statically to libgfortran. That has
pros and cons, but for libgfortran not many cons apart from space
for multiple copies in sundry packages (and is what is done on
Windows, BTW).
There are several ways to
Another possibility is to link statically to libgfortran. That has
pros and cons, but for libgfortran not many cons apart from space for
multiple copies in sundry packages (and is what is done on Windows,
BTW).
There are several ways to arrange that. As far as I recall I
temporarily removed
Hi Folks, I can find any hits anywhere for the following compilation error:
eigen.f
external subroutine BALANC
external subroutine BALBAK
external subroutine CBABK2
external subroutine CBAL
external subroutine CDIV
external subroutine COMQR
external subroutine COMQR2
extern
Thanks for the update and your work on this Simon.
Regards,
Marc
On Mar 4, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
> Just to calm the discussion a bit - we already have decided to go with
> Bugzilla, we created tools for the import of old PRs and the new bug system
> is up and running in a te
Just to calm the discussion a bit - we already have decided to go with
Bugzilla, we created tools for the import of old PRs and the new bug
system is up and running in a test phase. The current downtime is not
directly related to that - the cause is being investigated.
Cheers,
Simon
On Ma
On Mar 4, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Jens Elkner wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 09:39:41AM -0600, Marc Schwartz wrote:
>
>> There has been talk over the years of moving to Bugzilla, but I am not clear
>> on present status.
>
> IMHO Bugzilla is too challenging for normal users/human beeings (even
> d
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 05:42:24PM +0100, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
Hi Henrik,
> My Wednesday procrastination:
>
> There's quite some number of decimals in the SVG and some whitespace,
> so some dummy trimming gives:
>
> x <- readLines("http://developer.r-project.org/Logo/Rlogo-1.svg";);
...
Cool
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 09:39:41AM -0600, Marc Schwartz wrote:
> There has been talk over the years of moving to Bugzilla, but I am not clear
> on present status.
IMHO Bugzilla is too challenging for normal users/human beeings (even
developers are often not able to extract the info they need).
On Mar 4, 2010, at 9:29 AM, Tom Short wrote:
> Is the bug-reporting system working okay? Two days ago, I submitted
> the following bug report via email to r-b...@r-project.org. I didn't
> see a confirmation, and it didn't see it at
> http://bugs.r-project.org/. Now, http://bugs.r-project.org/ seem
Is the bug-reporting system working okay? Two days ago, I submitted
the following bug report via email to r-b...@r-project.org. I didn't
see a confirmation, and it didn't see it at
http://bugs.r-project.org/. Now, http://bugs.r-project.org/ seems to
be down.
Anyway, here's the bug report related t
On Mar 4, 2010, at 1:24 AM, Patrick Connolly wrote:
> On Wed, 03-Mar-2010 at 01:46PM -0600, Marc Schwartz wrote:
>
>
> |> Patrick, just as an FYI, I did not see which variant of CentOS you
> |> are using, but:
>
> Apologies. I didn't mention it's 5.4
No problem.
>
> |> CentOS 4, which is b
Dear Martin,
Martin Maechler wrote:
"CB" == Claudia Beleites
on Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:31:42 +0100 writes:
CB> Dear R-Developers,
CB> could 'sample' gain a ... argument?
As you may know, adding '...' also has drawbacks,
most notably that you lose automatic checking of correctly
spec
Hi Michael,
On Mar 3, 2010, at 12:01 , Michael Spiegel wrote:
I am the guy who compiles the OpenMx binaries. We would be
delighted to place our package on CRAN, once the project is stable
enough so that we are comfortable releasing it to the larger
public. Let's try to track down where I
I am the guy who compiles the OpenMx binaries. We would be delighted
to place our package on CRAN, once the project is stable enough so
that we are comfortable releasing it to the larger public. Let's try
to track down where I made a mistake. Our Makevars.in file contains
the line:
PKG_LIBS=$(F
Hello,
I have a test script that works fine when I copy and paste it into a R session.
I have the script in the tests directory of the package. But when I do R CMD
check on the package it runs all the tests OK on my first dataset in the
script, then I make a call to load() for the second datase
> "CB" == Claudia Beleites
> on Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:31:42 +0100 writes:
CB> Dear R-Developers,
CB> could 'sample' gain a ... argument?
As you may know, adding '...' also has drawbacks,
most notably that you lose automatic checking of correctly
specified argument names (when t
Thank you for your comments. I was indeed looking to use Rcpp for
integration for the C++ portions where compiled code would have performance
benefits while sticking to R code elsewhere.
I've had some previous bad experiences with Swig for interfacing C code with
Python code but it looks like Rcpp
19 matches
Mail list logo
