On 21/02/2010 12:44 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
I wasn't claiming there was an ambiguity but it does not perform
according to the operator precedence documented in ?Syntax . If it
performed as documented it would give an error.
There are a few other errors in that p
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
I wasn't claiming there was an ambiguity but it does not perform
according to the operator precedence documented in ?Syntax . If it
performed as documented it would give an error.
There are a few other errors in that page, e.g. saying that [ has
greater priority t
Paul Johnson wrote:
Hello, everybody.
I apologize if this is obvious. I've not tried to make changes in R
code within the R source itself before.
I'm pursuing an experiment to make RPM files for R packages
on-the-fly. Any time I install an R package successfully, I want to
wrap up those files
Hi,
C code for this problem is embedded. I am not clear about the
R_interface.c.
I would appreciate if someone could point out problems that may lead to
sporadic problems?
Thanks,
Russ
//c_mat.h
typedef struct cMatrix {
int m;
int n;
double *d;
} c_mat;
//c_mat.c
vo
There seem to be some issues with Windows 7 user accounts
(1)
Windows 7 64bit: User Account
Check.log - failed examples
sh.exe: The application was unable to start correctly (0Xc142)
Even when CMD.exe and sh.exe are run under admin privilege. This is however
not consistent. Sh.exe executes
On 21 February 2010 14:48, Barry Rowlingson
wrote:
> A while ago I played around with creating a new R logo using vector
> graphics. I took the current logo as a starting point. Here's some
> samples on different coloured backgrounds:
>
> http://www.maths.lancs.ac.uk/~rowlings/Graphics/Logo/R/log
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Jens Elkner wrote:
> Yes and scaling would be too resource consuming as well (very bad for
> menus, etc.). I think, the most challenging part here is all the
> [different type of] shadows. So does anybody know, who made the
> original pixel based image? If not ra
Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> FYI,
>
> you're much more likely to get a response/see actions on this if you
> report issues using the most recent stable version (R v2.10.1) and/or
> even the developers version (R v2.11.0). You're current version is,
> as you see, more than 2 years old. It is likely
Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
FYI,
you're much more likely to get a response/see actions on this if you
report issues using the most recent stable version (R v2.10.1) and/or
even the developers version (R v2.11.0). You're current version is,
as you see, more than 2 years old. It is likely that the t
FYI,
you're much more likely to get a response/see actions on this if you
report issues using the most recent stable version (R v2.10.1) and/or
even the developers version (R v2.11.0). You're current version is,
as you see, more than 2 years old. It is likely that the threshold to
compare the co
OK. I now have a version which seems to do the trick and reuses an
existing error message. Will commit to r-devel if and when make
check-devel succeeds.
-p
Peter Dalgaard wrote:
s...@userprimary.net wrote:
Thanks, Seth. Martin Morgan sent a patch for a few lines above yours,
which I didn't
s...@userprimary.net wrote:
Thanks, Seth. Martin Morgan sent a patch for a few lines above yours,
which I didn't have a chance to review until now:
- if (!isVectorList(x) && LENGTH(y) > 1)
- error(_("more elements supplied than there are to replace"));
+ if (!isVectorList(x) && LENGT
12 matches
Mail list logo
