On 21/11/2009 7:44 PM, Guillaume Yziquel wrote:
Duncan Murdoch a écrit :
I believe I should. I'd like the OCaml / R binding to be closely knit
to R internals. One reason would be for speed, the other being that
I'd like to make use of camlp4 to write syntax extensions to mix OCaml
and R syntax
On 21/11/2009 6:31 PM, Guillaume Yziquel wrote:
Simon Urbanek a écrit :
On Nov 21, 2009, at 4:12 PM, Guillaume Yziquel wrote:
Hello.
I've been looking at vecsexps for my binding.
Concerning strings, I'm wondering: are they supposed to be
null-delimited?
Yes, they are null-delimited when yo
Duncan Murdoch a écrit :
I believe I should. I'd like the OCaml / R binding to be closely knit
to R internals. One reason would be for speed, the other being that
I'd like to make use of camlp4 to write syntax extensions to mix OCaml
and R syntax. It's therefore important for me not to rely o
Simon Urbanek a écrit :
On Nov 21, 2009, at 4:12 PM, Guillaume Yziquel wrote:
Hello.
I've been looking at vecsexps for my binding.
Concerning strings, I'm wondering: are they supposed to be
null-delimited?
Yes, they are null-delimited when you create/access them.
OK. Fair enough. But is
On Nov 21, 2009, at 4:12 PM, Guillaume Yziquel wrote:
Hello.
I've been looking at vecsexps for my binding.
Concerning strings, I'm wondering: are they supposed to be null-
delimited?
Yes, they are null-delimited when you create/access them.
Are they delimited by the info in the SEXPHEADE
Hello.
I've been looking at vecsexps for my binding.
Concerning strings, I'm wondering: are they supposed to be
null-delimited? Are they delimited by the info in the SEXPHEADER macro
in Rinternals.h?
Basically, what are the macros or functions to access the values of the
vecsexps? I'm think
Thanks a lot, fixed.
Best,
Fritz
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:53:31 +0100,
> Jean lobry (Jl) wrote:
> Dear R-devel,
> googling for the single letter R yields R-home page as the firt hit,
> which is extremly nice.
> By clicking on the figure you get the code of the "Winner of the R
