Hello,
Is there a way, in C, to find how deep my current protection stack
is(apart from keeping a count).
I know the default nested size is 50,000 and because of some coding
error i think i'm reaching it.
Is there a way to find out the current depth reached?
Thank you
Saptarshi
___
On 02/09/2009 6:50 PM, Tony Plate wrote:
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 02/09/2009 4:10 PM, Stavros Macrakis wrote:
Let us stipulate that the current wording can be construed to be
correct.
I'd rather just state that the current wording is correct, without the
weasel words.
I would nonetheless cl
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 02/09/2009 4:10 PM, Stavros Macrakis wrote:
Let us stipulate that the current wording can be construed to be
correct.
I'd rather just state that the current wording is correct, without the
weasel words.
I would nonetheless claim that the documentation as currently
Hi,
Same here, we rely on these snapshots for the Bioconductor build system.
ftp://ftp.stat.math.ethz.ch/Software/R/
Now there seems to be a file (or symlink) named R-devel.tar.gz (note
that the files with a broken name e.g. R-devel_.tar.gz are still here).
The problem is that after download
On 02/09/2009 4:10 PM, Stavros Macrakis wrote:
Let us stipulate that the current wording can be construed to be correct.
I'd rather just state that the current wording is correct, without the
weasel words.
I would nonetheless claim that the documentation as currently written
is at best ambi
William, thank you so much! /tmp has noexec in the fstab and doesn't allow any
file
to be executable. I temporary changed those settings and I was able to
install rJava and RJDBC.
Perhaps the installation routine shouldn't use /tmp and use /var/tmp instead.
Many thanks,
Matt
-Original Mes
Let us stipulate that the current wording can be construed to be correct.
I would nonetheless claim that the documentation as currently written
is at best ambiguous and confusing, and would benefit from improved
wording.
What would be lost by that?
> One could argue that in R's pre-history we sh
You can use a calling handler along with sys.calls, something like
f <- function() g()
g <- function() stop("A")
tryCatch(withCallingHandlers(f(),
error = function(e) {
e$calls <- sys.calls()
On 9/2/2009 2:39 PM, Stavros Macrakis wrote:
The documentation for is.atomic and is.recursive is inconsistent with
their behavior in R 2.9.1 Windows.
? is.atomic
'is.atomic' returns 'TRUE' if 'x' is an atomic vector (or 'NULL')
and 'FALSE' otherwise.
...
'is.atomic' is true
My apologies. I've been through sevearl other forums the last few days working
through this. I forgot my manners.
I'll read the guide. FYI... I'm using the /usr/sfw/bin/gcc compiler. Version
3.4.3 along with GNU Make from sunfreeware.com
I figured it's not an R issue as the documentation f
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Stavros Macrakis wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Stavros Macrakis wrote:
>
>> Most types of language objects are regarded as recursive: those
>> which are not are the atomic vector types, 'NULL' and symbols (as
>> given by 'as.name').
>>
>> Bu
Please read the posting guide and the R-admin manual.
This is a symptom of a misconfigured compiler/system headers, and you
have not told us what you are using. It is not an R issue, so please
consult your OS support line (and almost certianly you are not using a
Sun compiler here): maybe you
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Stavros Macrakis wrote:
> Most types of language objects are regarded as recursive: those
> which are not are the atomic vector types, 'NULL' and symbols (as
> given by 'as.name').
>
> But is.recursive(as.name('foo')) == is.recursive(quote(foo)) == FA
The documentation for is.atomic and is.recursive is inconsistent with
their behavior in R 2.9.1 Windows.
? is.atomic
'is.atomic' returns 'TRUE' if 'x' is an atomic vector (or 'NULL')
and 'FALSE' otherwise.
...
'is.atomic' is true for the atomic vector types ('"logical"',
On Sep 1, 2009, at 17:41 , gvst...@yahoo.com wrote:
2009/8/30 Uwe Ligges :
[snip]
Guido van Steen wrote:
[snip]
Something that interests me too: What about R's policy with
respect to
including binary files? I saw that developers should include a file
[snip]
Please do not include binary fil
I've been trying to compile 2.9.2 under solaris 10 the last couple days without
success. configure runs fine and I'm using GNU Make. We're trying to build
under 64 bit (and I'm wondering if this might be part of our problem). Here is
the output from the make...
ld: warning: file /usr/local/
> -Original Message-
> From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
> [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Matias Silva
> Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 9:05 AM
> To: Simon Urbanek
> Cc: r-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Rd] Installing rJava RJDBC bad interpreter:
> Permis
Hi Simon, thanks for responding, I really appreciate it. If there is a problem
with /bin/sh then I could not install
any packages(??). I installed a DBI package successfully. I have also tried
this on 3 different machines - 2 CentOS 5.3
and 1 RHEL 5.3. I can try this using Ubuntu later toda
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
Debabrata Midya wrote:
Dear R users,
Thanks in advance.
I am using R 2.9.1 on Windows XP.
May I request you to assist me on the following:
I have downloaded Rtools29.exe and installed it today 02 Sep 2009 and I
have also provided the appropriate
Hi all,
The help for traceback states:
Errors which are caught _via_ 'try' or 'tryCatch' do not generate
a traceback, so what is printed is the call sequence for the last
uncaught error, and not necessarily for the last error.
Is there any way to get a traceback (or something similar) for
Full_Name: ivo welch
Version: 2.9.2
OS: OSX
Submission from: (NULL) (128.148.61.243)
could you please add in the "See also" section of "plot" a link to "persp for 3d
plots", and in the "persp" See also section links to
cloud() in package "lattice"
plot3d() in package "rgl"
scatterplot3d() in pa
Allen,
On Sep 2, 2009, at 2:53 , Allen S. Rout wrote:
I'm working to automate the building of RPM packages for CRAN &c.
In the process, I'm trying to get a sense of the correct dependencies.
It's my sense that R CMD CHECK is the Right Way to check to see if a
package is built properly. B
On 09/02/2009 01:13 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
Romain Francois wrote:
Hello,
(This is a remix of this previous thread:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2009-August/054264.html , but
with a concrete example)
I am developing some packages that contain scripts (for Rscript) and
would like t
On Sep 1, 2009, at 21:05 , Matias Silva wrote:
Trying to install the above two packages via the
"install.packages("package_name")" command and
the "R CMD INSTALL file.tar.gz".
I receive the following error either way "sh: ./configure: /bin/sh:
bad interpreter: Permission denied".
I have tr
Romain Francois wrote:
Hello,
(This is a remix of this previous thread:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2009-August/054264.html , but
with a concrete example)
I am developing some packages that contain scripts (for Rscript) and
would like to know what is the best/recommended way to s
Hello,
(This is a remix of this previous thread:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2009-August/054264.html , but
with a concrete example)
I am developing some packages that contain scripts (for Rscript) and
would like to know what is the best/recommended way to ship these scripts.
An
Debabrata Midya wrote:
Dear R users,
Thanks in advance.
I am using R 2.9.1 on Windows XP.
May I request you to assist me on the following:
I have downloaded Rtools29.exe and installed it today 02 Sep 2009 and I have also provided the appropriate path variable for Rtools.
I have checke
Allen S. Rout wrote:
I'm working to automate the building of RPM packages for CRAN &c. In
the process, I'm trying to get a sense of the correct dependencies.
It's my sense that R CMD CHECK is the Right Way to check to see if a
package is built properly. But according to Writing R Extension
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:49 AM, Pin Tian Ng wrote:
> I developed some code that called subroutines from the Port3 Library
> (http://www-out.bell-labs.com/project/PORT/). I¹m thinking about making it
> available as an R package. But I¹m not sure if their NON-EXCLUSIVE SOURCE
> CODE LICENSE AG
29 matches
Mail list logo
